the scan field motivator
By Henryk Szubinski
The joint quantum entropy generalizes the classical joint entropy to the context of quantum information theory. Intuitively, given two quantum states ρ and σ, represented as density operators that are subparts of a quantum system, the joint quantum entropy is a measure the total uncertainty or entropy of the joint system. It is written S(ρ,σ) or H(ρ,σ), depending on the notation being used for the von Neumann entropy. Like other entropies, the joint quantum entropy is measured in bits, i.e. the logarithm is taken in base 2.
In this article, we will use S(ρ,σ) for the joint quantum entropy.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN WHEN A POSITIONALITY of a robot predictive
=is reversed to define the basis
of a sci fi situation where the basis of locating a processor=
in mid height values of enthropy
as detected by a type cluster programme that is=
in the float type interactions
with the primary = 1 level of input
into a parameter of force circumstances=
way ahead of the others
by being the only indicator of the true enterance process of a a.i locator
=that can motivate the functionings of a warp drive artificial gravity
anti matter and force field by the usage of a variance
= in predictive delays of its situation in a large field of data
and forces by the primary parameter localisations =
of a system waiting with no reward basis but the destiny type examples =
In information theory, for any classical random variable X, the classical Shannon entropy H(X) is a measure of how uncertain we are about the outcome of X. For example, if X is a probability distribution concentrated at one point, the outcome of X is certain and therefore its entropy H(X) = 0. At the other extreme, if X is the uniform probability distribution with n possible values, intuitively one would expect X is associated with the most uncertainty. Indeed such uniform probability distributions have maximum possible entropy H(X) = log2(n).
In quantum information theory, the notion of entropy is extended from probability distributions to quantum states, or density matrices. For a state ρ, the von Neumann entropy is defined by
-
Applying the spectral theorem, or Borel functional calculus for infinite dimensional systems, we see that it generalizes the classical entropy. The physical meaning remains the same. A maximally mixed state, the quantum analog of the uniform probability distribution, has maximum von Neumann entropy. On the other hand, a pure state, or a rank one projection, will have zero von Neumann entropy. We write the von Neumann entropy S(ρ) (or sometimes H(ρ).
THIS TYPE OF EVENT CAN BE LOCATED DUE TO A BASIC SUPER STABILITY IN THE FIELD OF ACCESS OVER A SPECIFIC FORCE HORIZON AS A OPEN TYPE OF FORCE:that has all the characteristics of multi vector event but can be located due to a quantal value in it multiple vector values in the ventuality of a type tube into the half way inputs of a type
x. enthropy 10 D = 1/2 F ( volume ) q
as a starter the usage of 10 dimensionality is a locative motivation fr the types of advancive formats in usage to locate a minimally altered time process both in the forwards direction as well as in the reversed time parameters of aminimally differenciative format for a usage to access force over the great divide which would qualify it for status = a greater generalisation of the functionings of a force that can simplify the proceedures of a alternate vector into calculations of a vechicularity that has noone of the sideffects of wear decrepidation or advanced ageing of its systems:
of a starwars movie scene:
Cluster analysis or clustering is the assignment of a set of observations into subsets (called clusters) so that observations in the same cluster are similar in some sense. Clustering is a method of unsupervised learning, and a common technique for statistical data analysis used in many fields, including machine learning, data mining, pattern recognition, image analysis and bioinformatics.
Besides the term clustering, there are a number of terms with similar meanings, including automatic classification, numerical taxonomy, botryology and typological analysis.
In fuzzy clustering, each point has a degree of belonging to clusters, as in fuzzy logic, rather than belonging completely to just one cluster. Thus, points on the edge of a cluster, may be in the cluster to a lesser degree than points in the center of cluster. For each point x we have a coefficient giving the degree of being in the kth cluster uk(x). Usually, the sum of those coefficients for any given x is defined to be 1:
-
With fuzzy c-means, the centroid of a cluster is the mean of all points, weighted by their degree of belonging to the cluster:
-
The degree of belonging is related to the inverse of the distance to the cluster center:
-
then the coefficients are normalized and fuzzyfied with a real parameter m > 1 so that their sum is 1. So
-
For m equal to 2, this is equivalent to normalising the coefficient linearly to make their sum 1. When m is close to 1, then cluster center closest to the point is given much more weight than the others, and the algorithm is similar to k-means.
The fuzzy c-means algorithm is very similar to the k-means algorithm:[4]
- Choose a number of clusters.
- Assign randomly to each point coefficients for being in the clusters.
- Repeat until the algorithm has converged (that is, the coefficients’ change between two iterations is no more than , the given sensitivity threshold) :
- Compute the centroid for each cluster, using the formula above.
- For each point, compute its coefficients of being in the clusters, using the formula above.
The algorithm minimizes intra-cluster variance as well, but has the same problems as k-means, the minimum is a local minimum, and the results depend on the initial choice of weights. The expectation-maximization algorithm is a more statistically formalized method which includes some of these ideas: partial membership in classes. It has better convergence properties and is in general preferred to fuzzy-c-means.
ata courtesy of wikipedia