sci fi reality….magellan force OTHER SIDE STORE

 

magellan force

O2 Force comparatives

By Henryk Szubinski

TELESCOPIC RECTICLES:  ON THE HOWL RESPONSE OF A DRAWN OUT AND MINIMALISED FORMAT FOR A 3 LEVEL :the closest to audiality on a format for the audio visual interactives on a process by which to localise dark matter:

freedoom of knowledge based 5th law 5th framework Chordis6

File:Reticles vector.svg

The Magellanic Clouds have been known since the earliest times by the ancient Middle Eastern peoples. The first preserved mention of the Large Magellanic Cloud was by Persian astronomer Al Sufi, who in 964, in his Book of Fixed Stars, calls it al-Bakr, meaning “the White Ox”, of the southern Arabs, and points out that while invisible from Northern Arabia and Baghdad, this object is visible from the strait of Bab el Mandeb, at 12°15′ Northern latitude.[1]

In Europe, the Clouds were first observed by Italian Peter Martyr and Andreas Corsali at the end of the 15 century. Subsequently, they were reported by Antonio Pigafetta for the expedition of Ferdinand Magellan during the circumnavigation in 1519–1522.[1] However, naming the clouds after Magellan did not become widespread until much later. In Bayer’s Uranometria they are designated as NVBECVLA MAIOR[4] and NVBECVLA MINOR[4]; even in French astronomer Lacaille‘s 1756 star map, they are designated as le Grand Nuage[5] and le Petit Nuage.[5] (i.e. the “Large Cloud” and the “Small Cloud”, in Latin or French).

the problem of using a one unit advantage on the formats of tri value systems as being able to connect to the VIKING probe on Mars or the pioneer vechicles on the orbits of Neptune as giving a responsive advantage over the data on TIME as a process that cannot end.

File:Rangefinder reticle 08a.svg

A BASIC TELESCOPIC RANGE IN WHICH THE PROCESS OF TURBULENCE BEING INVOLVED IN THE DATA ON THE BASE LEVEL OF APPROACHES TO THE DEFINITIONS OF WHAT IS LOCALISED DOES NOT EQUATE TO THE FORMATS OF THE BASICS IN TIME

when the perspecive range of atmospherical events are coupled to space time by the values of a conductivity of site —>objective

as speed of sound by audial indications are not always the same format of a localised problem that drives the objective cloud to the motion of a

action / reaction = Force

AS A PHOTON CERTAINTY IN THE CALCULATIONS OF FORCE:

File:Magellanic Clouds ― Irregular Dwarf Galaxies .jpg

Telescopic sights are usually designed for the specific application for which they are intended. Those different designs create certain optical parameters. Those parameters are:

Magnification — The ratio of the focal length of the eyepiece divided into the focal length of the objective gives the linear magnifying power of telescopes. A magnification of factor 10, for example, produces an image as if one were 10 times closer to the object. The amount of magnification depends upon the application the telescopic sight is designed for. Lower magnifications lead to less susceptibility to shaking. A larger magnification leads to a smaller field of view.

Objective lens diameter – The diameter of the objective lens determines how much light can be gathered to form an image. It is usually expressed in millimeters.

Field of view — The field of view of a telescopic sight is determined by its optical design. It is usually notated in a linear value, such as how many meters (feet) in width will be seen at 100 m (or 100 yd), or in an angular value of how many degrees can be viewed.

Exit pupil — Telescopic sights concentrate the light gathered by the objective into a beam, the exit pupil, whose diameter is the objective diameter divided by the magnifying power. For maximum effective light-gathering and brightest image, the exit pupil should equal the diameter of the fully dilated iris of the human eye — about 7 mm, reducing with age. If the cone of light streaming out of the eyepiece is larger than the pupil it is going into, any light larger than the pupil is wasted in terms of providing information to the eye.

However, a larger exit pupil makes it easier to put the eye where it can receive the light: anywhere in the large exit pupil cone of light will do. This ease of placement helps avoid vignetting, which is a darkened or obscured view that occurs when the light path is partially blocked. And, it means that the image can be quickly found which is important when aiming at game animals that move rapidly. A narrow exit pupil telescopic sight may also be fatiguing because the instrument must be held exactly in place in front of the eyes to provide a useful image. Finally, many people in Europe use their telescopic sights at dusk, dawn and at night, when their pupils are larger. Thus the daytime exit pupil of about 3 to 4 mm is not a universally desirable standard. For comfort, ease of use, and flexibility in applications, larger telescopic sights with larger exit pupils are satisfying choices even if their capability is not fully used by day.

sci fi reality….human robotic universe cognitions computer

 

cognitive android constructs of the universe

By Henryk Szubinski

The Great Wall (also called Coma Wall), sometimes specifically referred to as the CfA2 Great Wall, is one of largest known super-structures in the Universe (the largest two being the Sloan Great Wall and the Pisces-Cetus Supercluster Complex). It is a filament of galaxies approximately 200 million light-years away and has dimensions which measure over 500 million light-years long, 300 million light-years wide and 15 million light-years thick. It was discovered in 1989 by Margaret Geller and John Huchra based on redshift survey data from the CfA Redshift Survey.[1]

It is not known how much farther the wall extends due to the plane of the Milky Way galaxy in which Earth is located. The gas and dust from the Milky Way (known as the zone of avoidance) obscures the view of astronomers and have so far made it impossible to determine if the wall ends or continues on further than they can currently observe.

The Standard Model cannot account for such large structures, so in the actual cosmology it is hypothesized that such structures as the Great Wall form along and follow web-like strings of dark matter.[citation needed] It is thought that this dark matter dictates the structure of the Universe on the grandest of scales. Dark matter gravitationally attracts baryonic matter, and it is this normal matter that astronomers see forming long, thin walls of super-galactic clusters.

the deep sky survey of the universes 100 billion galaxies and the relationship to a human computer barin as the cognitions of the specific amounts of the divisions of left / right cognitive values:

The missing data on the left hemisphere ,even by turning the representations into a frontal rear perspective still has some basics in 3 Dimensions to which the

40 ——->10 left / right

front / rear : 1o ——–>40 %

rear front : 40———>10 %

as a sum of the values a computer a.i brain in its full capacity=

60 %————->90 %

the amount of cognition would be unevenly distibuted when the relative image used for the lower value =10%

IN WHICH CASE THE  60 % is dominant

the opposite case is also true for the high value = 40 %

IN WHICH CASE THE 90 % is dominant:

the basic over and under levels are 10 %to—increase / decrease—>10 %

this defines the basics of a oredered process in which unified similarity on the 3 D planes of 3 parameters in equal distribiution =

10/3 =3.33/3

=1.1/3

=0.3 % —————->increase / decrease ————>0.3 %

in basic language this means that the process of responses to the general spacetime of values that increse by reversal of a decimal repeater can be evened out by the process of 

a)

1.1———–>3.3

b)

3.3————–>10

in which case the b)= a stop process and the a ) =string value meater ( inferrometer)

and the resultant data on responses to the general spacetime of compensations to a system started by a 60/90 % deciaml value from the cause of 10 /40 %

is in fact the computational similarity of sustainements in the universe by the value of similar responses to a unified field of cognition = to the ability of data on the force as =basic tubularity of the whole cognition in a spherical format = to the data analisis on basic data of inferior processess as are registerd to be within the mason range of a relations to a human UNIVERSE computer:

in which a human brain copuld actually be logged into by a type hyperspace dimension.

the data on why hyperspace can alter the full values of a responsive environment of 100 to the 100 to the 100 as the limitations of B bit numbers as the highest values computable is also the reason why the Force = m.a in its basic implications of a larger format of referenced relational data on the vectors taken and their limited interactions as the definitions of the values that are forced by the designated point dimensionality of spacetime points in which human interactions are limited to interaction and the basics of the stop limitations is not seen as a progressive format for contruct relativity without the audial formats of communication..

sci fi reality……..white hole Force equations

 

data on white hole equations

By Henryk Szubinski

attract reversals

basis white holes:

A central tenet in science is that a scientific theory is supposed to have predictive power, and verification of predictions are seen as an important and necessary support for the theory. The theory of evolution has provided such predictions. Three examples are:

PREEMPTING THE VALUES OF UNIVERSAL MULTI UNIVERSES IN HYPERSPACE DIMENSIONS OF A 16 D SPACETIME PREDICTIVE OF THE CONTINUED NON RESTRICTIONS OF THE BIT VALUE B AS ANY FORMAT OF UNIVERSES IN INTERACTIONS:

File:LorentzianWormhole.jpg

swarzchild wormholes as THE BASIC BACKGROUND ON WHITE HOLES:

Theories of wormhole metrics describe the spacetime geometry of a wormhole and serve as theoretical models for time travel. An example of a (traversable) wormhole metric is the following:

ds^2= - c^2 dt^2 + dl^2 + (k^2 + l^2)(d \theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2).

One type of non-traversable wormhole metric is the Schwarzschild solution:

ds^2= - c^2 \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2}\right)dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2}} + r^2(d \theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2).

 

In astrophysics, a white hole is the hypothetical time reversal of a black hole. While a black hole acts as an attractor, drawing in any matter that crosses the event horizon, a white hole acts as a source that ejects matter from its event horizon. The sign of the acceleration is invariant (unchanged) under time reversal, so both black and white holes attract matter. The only potential difference between them is in the behavior at the horizon.

Black hole event horizons can only “suck up” matter, while white hole horizons ostensibly recede from any incoming matter at the local speed of light, so that the infalling matter never crosses. The infalling matter is then scattered and re-emitted at the death of the white hole, receding to infinity after having come close to the final singular point where the white hole is destroyed. The total proper time until an infalling object encounters the singular endpoint is the same as the proper time to be swallowed by a black hole, so the white hole picture does not say what happens to the infalling matter. Ignoring the classically unpredictable emissions of the white hole, the white hole and black hole are indistinguishable for external observers.

ATTRACT REVERSAL BY ITSELF AS A SINGULAR RESULTANT

1-(x+y)=singularity

the usage of gravity as the coupling to the basis of attract reversal

g(1-x) =(1+y)

as a FORMAT FOR GRAVITY REVERSALS IN T SYMMETRY:

THE DATA WILL SHOW THE SUBSEQUENT DATA CONNECTION TO GRAVITY ATTRACTIONS :

but first the gravity reversal:using the previous equation

1-(x+y)=g-1

T Symmetry is the symmetry of physical laws under a time reversal transformation:

 T: t \mapsto -t.

Although in restricted contexts one may find this symmetry, the observable universe itself does not show symmetry under time reversal, primarily due to the second law of thermodynamics.

Time asymmetries are generally distinguished as either those which are intrinsic to the dynamic laws of nature, and those that are due to the initial conditions of our universe. The T-asymmetry of the weak force is of the first kind, while the T-asymmetry of the second law of thermodynamics is of the second kind.

gravity attract then is:sing the previous formulation:

g(1-x)=F+1

The statement “evolution is both a theory and a fact” is often seen in biological literature.[1][2][3][4][4][5][6][7] The “fact of evolution” refers to the changes in the genetic material of a population of biological organisms over time, which are known to have occurred through scientific observations and experiments. The “theory of evolution” refers to the modern evolutionary synthesis, which is the current scientific explanation of how these changes occur. Misuse and misunderstanding of these terms have been used to construct arguments disputing the validity of the theory of evolution.

the complete formulations is then:

g(1-x)=F+1

1-(x+y)=g-1

on a full value interaction by the super force of white holes to combine every format of any frmulation by the interactor type 1 of any formulation based on its super combinations characteristics:

g(1-x)=F+1 ((1-(x+y))

=g-1 as differencial dg

=g-1/x—> dx

F1= x /y<— dy

using the previous formulations of Newtons force equations as being totally fased out by the usage of a white hole positionality as combined differencials in what is a diffcoupleator:

g=F+1 ((1-(y)

both sides of the equation contain similar data so that the pre differencial of a F squared or a 2F value in its combined value:

2F cubed =g

combined theory of using the differencials as the common values in a format of cancelled values that are similar in the processings that were used by Newton but not cancelled due to the functions of force in the example of no greater than force as in White holes shown here: so there is some remaining value , enough to relate.

g=F+1 ((1-(y)

the g squared /<–2F dF

y–>dy

g=-4F cubed

so that the gravity of a black hole on the laternate side of a parallell universe is balanced by the reversals of the dimensional spacetime of a white hole in a force value volume in 3 dimensions:

the accertion could also be made on a 10 D space time hyperspace:

10g .D=-40 F as from the parallel universe

and

-40D.F = 10 g from the white hole perspective universe by a common F multiple not as to the power of 10

but as a B bit x value:

-40D.F = 10 g(B.x)

10g .D=-40 F

the two computations cancell each other:

4g.F=1/4F.B.g.x

16 =B.g.x

on a 10 d level the data on the y value and  z value would be a format of decimals:

16 y 1/6=B.g.x .1/12.z

sci fi reality…..audiovechicularity

 

audivechicularity

By Henryk Szubinski

a audial experiment with the moon in orbital position = x

connected to earth position = y

as the positional interactions of a direct position = z

as the expeeriment of a programmed audial value to be sent to the x position by a wavelength = F1x

and the receptive value of a similar value = Fy

as the common value of the audial signal being replicated as Fy.z=F1x

the problems of a common similarity are due to the need of having the x point receptor immersed in the SOH environment of the Crater on the moon = Area

A = SOH wavelength .z

and the positionality of a response as having the

point y = area on earth as H2O .z.height of immersion

the experiment is to define the translocations of audial signals in the fluid / solid interactions environment of fluidity as the audial similarity of audial wavelength values:

As a type usage for the spacetravel by audio frequencies or the advancements of vechicularity on earth and other planets.

y values and z values as = ions and their proton recombinations or the fluid / solid interactions force of the communicatives of a direct link to Oxidised audiality

sci f reality…..wikipedia specialisations as web phone earth web type 1

 

wikipedia expansions

By Henryk Szubinski

BRANE SIDE VIEW COMPRESSION AS A STRING THEORY

S ( 1+D) =wavelength (x-1).1/x

functions only on data retreivals of compressed branes:

File:Skyshot.jpg

a type 1 relationship = IS ALREADY THERE as doing the work on audial portal measurers of their interactions ( because SOH and H2O are crucial to the differences of O2 alterance)

PHONE LAW 1

on the usage of a wikipedia expansion of the freedoom of knowlledge 5th

PHONE LAW WEB

law in E.U as the 5th framework in the freedoom of knowledge as at the

PHONE EARTH WEB

cutting edge of providng rapid usage by sections of content by context

COMPUTERISATIONS

and bit cutt offs for the values of accuracy:

using non visual interactions by a LCD or plasma screen as a type sonic field in place of visual signal particle fields:

The formats of a buoyancy of the audiality field as interactive by higher velocity recognitions by a data bank type wikipedia as random device pointing= a data factuality on audial referenced descriptives of a robot voice to which the screen levels of the audial environment is also a data bank on sound scapes as a library usable in the A.I associations by the usage of portal sound mix filtrations of:

O2 environment——>SOH audial—–>H2O audial—–>portal

In theoretical physics, a membrane, brane, or p-brane is a spatially extended mathematical concept that appears in string theory and its relatives (M-theory and brane cosmology) that exists in a static number of dimensions.

The variable p refers to the number of spatial dimensions of the brane. That is, a 0-brane is a zero-dimensional pointlike particle, a 1-brane is a string, that can either be open or closed, a 2-brane is a “membrane”, etc. Every p-brane sweeps out a (p+1)-dimensional world volume as it propagates through spacetime.

data descriptives of a knowledge value= audial

data on the environment of audials = a descriptive

audial / descriptive =knowledge/environment

as a type filter/portal

by the screen alterations as already there in the filter >/ portal =SOH / H2O

as the audial screen recognitions of 3 screens

1)

 =H2O bouyancy field

2)

of a SOH bouyancy opposed field screen

3)

and the filter / portal = mix

the type monitoring on the neevironemnet and voice usage would replicate the environment in the foreground or background.

DATA ON A FULL VALUE

100%————————————–>1 % COMPRESSED DATA

AS A

10 %—————————————–>100% DATA FULL

AS A

100 %—————————————>100% FULL ALTERATION

Lossy audio compression is used in an extremely wide range of applications. In addition to the direct applications (mp3 players or computers), digitally compressed audio streams are used in most video DVDs; digital television; streaming media on the internet; satellite and cable radio; and increasingly in terrestrial radio broadcasts. Lossy compression typically achieves far greater compression than lossless compression (data of 5 percent to 20 percent of the original stream, rather than 50 percent to 60 percent), by discarding less-critical data.

The innovation of lossy audio compression was to use psychoacoustics to recognize that not all data in an audio stream can be perceived by the human auditory system. Most lossy compression reduces perceptual redundancy by first identifying sounds which are considered perceptually irrelevant, that is, sounds that are very hard to hear. Typical examples include high frequencies, or sounds that occur at the same time as louder sounds. Those sounds are coded with decreased accuracy or not coded at all.

While removing or reducing these ‘unhearable’ sounds may account for a small percentage of bits saved in lossy compression, the real savings comes from a complementary phenomenon: noise shaping. Reducing the number of bits used to code a signal increases the amount of noise in that signal. In psychoacoustics-based lossy compression, the real key is to ‘hide’ the noise generated by the bit savings in areas of the audio stream that cannot be perceived. This is done by, for instance, using very small numbers of bits to code the high frequencies of most signals – not because the signal has little high frequency information (though this is also often true as well), but rather because the human ear can only perceive very loud signals in this region, so that softer sounds ‘hidden’ there simply aren’t heard

courtesy of Chordis6

and data research wikipedia..

sci fi reality…petal universe

 

petal galaxies

By Henryk Szubinski

 

 

if you were to use every extendable format of a similarity to a flower and a petal.

 

 

 

THE BASIC RESULTANT OF REMOOVING EACH SUBSEQUENT PETAL FROM A POSITION THAT SURROUNDS THE GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE FLOWERS

  core, the resultant value of the flower without petals would resemble the typical structure of a continuous roitation of a galaxy in comparison to the velocity of a structure so greatly affected by the pulling and tearing off of a type

 

 

pull petal off = angular momentum ( impulse)-F

of the basics involved with a force to pull and a force that is effected by pull.

 

 

 you might suppose that at some stage of the universe there were galaxies that were dark matter similar; evidence of this is seen in dark matter rings with their characteristic positional pull out zones or a parameter in each section of it that has tensional evidence of high velocity pull and flexation responses back into the core of the gravity event.

 

Can there be a model of galaxies as once were= to flowers and can this model be the explanation of the violent history of a universe where each galaxy was violently disslocated from its type

 

Petal = parashute

in which the alterations of a decimal value

amount of petals /odd value = even value velocity

 

 

 

File:Seyfert Sextet full.jpg

 

 

you can see clearly here the type of petal involvement that is defined as:

 

1)

the basic data on process continuiims of galaxies

 

2)

the value systems whereby the process to connect is based on the  vector value in each petal as the gravity type connection to a central spinning core

 

3)

 the data on how to utilise the formations of data processing of the generalisations by which eeach petal galaxy has varying sequenced interactions of the core value between them inside aech rotating petal galaxy.

 

 

 what is occuring at the feyman vectors is a general pull off a petal relationship where the vectro gravity / anti gravity =to anti matter in pure vector spacetime as with the relationship of galaxies in petal relationships ( shown as 1,2,3)

 

 

 

 

The Wick’s expansion of the integrand gives (among others) the following term

N\bar\psi(x)\gamma^\mu\psi(x)\bar\psi(x')\gamma^\nu\psi(x')\underline{A_\mu(x)A_\nu(x')}\;,

where

\underline{A_\mu(x)A_\nu(x')}=\int{d^4p\over(2\pi)^4}{ig_{\mu\nu}\over k^2+i0}e^{-k(x-x')}

is the electromagnetic contraction (propagator) in the Feynman gauge. This term is represented by the Feynman diagram at the right. This diagram gives contributions to the following processes:

  1. e e scattering (initial state at the right, final state at the left of the diagram);
  2. e + e + scattering (initial state at the left, final state at the right of the diagram);
  3. e e + scattering (initial state at the bottom/top, final state at the top/bottom of the diagram).

 

 

 

 

references to petals:

 

He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not or She Loves Me, She Loves Me Not (originally effeuiller la marguerite in French) is a game of French origin, in which one person seeks to determine whether the object of their affection returns that affection or not.

A person playing the game alternately speaks the phrases “He [or she] loves me,” and “He loves me not,” while picking one petal off a flower (usually an oxeye daisy) for each phrase. The phrase they speak on picking off the last petal supposedly represents the truth between the object of their affection loving them or not. The player typically is motivated by attraction to the person they’re speaking of while reciting the phrases. They may seek to reaffirm a pre-existing belief, or act out of whimsy.

A humorous twist on the game, is, “She Loves Me, She Loves Me Lots.”

File:The-Decision-of-the-Flower.png

imagine for a moment the amount of pull = to rotation without a value for reduced friction or deccelleration of a force in the process which suddenly implies a relationship where there is no more dynamical stability in a system that once was based on the petals that were not only in large so large that they would fill the spacetime between other galaxies but also that this defined their stability as in a non motion state against each other:

The Andromeda Galaxy (pronounced /ænˈdrɒmədə/, also known as Messier 31, M31, or NGC 224; often referred to as the Great Andromeda Nebula in older texts) is a spiral galaxy approximately 2,500,000 light-years (1.58×1011 AU) away[4] in the constellation Andromeda. It is the nearest spiral galaxy to our own, the Milky Way. As it is visible as a faint smudge on a moonless night, it is one of the farthest objects visible to the naked eye, and can be seen even from urban areas with binoculars. It is named after the princess Andromeda (Greek: Ανδρομέδη – Andromédē) in Greek mythology. Andromeda is the largest galaxy of the Local Group, which consists of the Andromeda Galaxy, the Milky Way Galaxy, the Triangulum Galaxy, and about 30 other smaller galaxies. Although the largest, Andromeda may not be the most massive, as recent findings suggest that the Milky Way contains more dark matter and may be the most massive in the grouping.[9] The 2006 observations by the Spitzer Space Telescope revealed that M31 contains one trillion (1012) stars,[10] several times more than the number of stars in our own galaxy, which is estimated to be c. 200-400 billion.[11]

While the 2006 estimates put the mass of the Milky Way to be ~80% of the mass of Andromeda, which is estimated to be 7.1 × 1011 solar masses,[2] a 2009 study concluded that Andromeda and the Milky Way are about equal in mass.[12]

the petal is purely conceptual . What is implied is the usage of a type format that would fill the general space time of a 50 % filled universe in its volumetrical stability; in which case the data on a volumetrical connection to planar ones is defined only as a petal: this being so, the spacetime of theoretical astrophysical reasoning is that there was a period in which much of astrophysics went unaccounted for: the basic reasoning of the applications of multiple reasons:

a petal can be a Feyman diagramm it can also be a minkowski format..