universe linear equation, solving the Einstein Hawkins problem ..: flying car

the linear equation of the universe

By Henryk Szubinski
.

prooving that einstein vector values for infinite mass are equated with Hawkins infinite gravity of a black hole
and that this link is the basic equated vector exchange sum of one vector mooving forwards in spacetime or being still in the time dialations of a phton and the vector down of a gravity in infinite value mass
would proove the existance of a spacetime surface level that supports any mass object in motion on it by basic fased exchanges of thoose values.
.
.
.
.
.universal levels

a spacetime black hole will not result in the Einstein super gravity > c accelleration into infinite density and mass
It would basically decrease its very high almost infinite gravity
meaning that the strength of gravity has a null point on the start of any or all inclines where the gravity is so small that the vechicle displacein up a incline can use this by a basic boost

as such this value force remains the same while the gravity work done on the vechicle will reduce all the way up to the regular surface without any incline

to a level of almost no mass on the horizon.
prooving that gravity of a black hole can work in reduction by the event horizon being the incline at levels to the basic spacetime
So a black hole implosition could basically make it out again , from the gravity warp of spacetime
.
.
.
.


.
.

driving on a steep incline with a vechicle gets to be difficult the higher the incline
but it reduces the higher you get on the incline and then levels out without any gravity opposition on the horizon.
.
.the parallellograms are subject to compression by gravity in the LEVEL OUT horizon being the equated 112 values in x spacetime
so that the 67 area flattening is a function of the multiples in division up the incline.
.
.

what is observed here represented as HAWKINS and EINSTEIN
is infinite mass and infinite gravity
theese 2 can be orientated about the x,y axial values to show how much turning of the parameters are made and their resultances

.
.
is the upside down point of view where the gravity points at the x axis are shown with current HAWKINS theory as NO UP from a EINSTEIN GRAVITY WARP

but EInstein

as being the top side where the remnance of a gravity beam displaces outwards or UPP in the alternate dimension point of view.
would do exactly what he defined as infinite mass gain as a object reaches the infinitely small interval of equal to light speed.
.
.
.
But this point x value is the start values for the increased y axial values for the decrease of time dialations and aquired infinite mass in reverse.
meaning that both cancell each other out.
.
.
.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s