A.I :Quest for space colonisation

article on deduction

By Henryk Szubinski
repports from the OVER SELF

Chordis 3
4 freedooms
5th freedoom of knowledge moovement
Chordis 6
the 7th framework

basically meeting Paul Brunton on the 1/2 way point he defined as meditation
Brunton basically used this format the first time during the 30 s , 40 s , 50 s, to define the basis of all base motivations as the usability of denial in Journalism and the resultances of the concept he coined as MEDITATION and the many interpretations model as being scientific

Many-worlds is a postulate of quantum mechanics that asserts the objective reality of the universal wavefunction, but denies the reality of wavefunction collapse, which implies that all possible alternative histories and futures are real—each representing an actual “world” (or “universe”). It is also referred to as MWI, the relative state formulation, the Everett interpretation, the theory of the universal wavefunction, many-universes interpretation, or just many worlds.
The original relative state formulation is due to Hugh Everett in 1957.[2][3] Later, this formulation was popularized and renamed many-worlds by Bryce Seligman DeWitt in the 1960s and ’70s.[1][4][5][6]
Many-worlds claims to reconcile how we can perceive non-deterministic events, such as the random decay of a radioactive atom, with the deterministic equations of quantum physics. Prior to many-worlds, reality had been viewed as a single unfolding history. Many-worlds, rather, views reality as a many-branched tree, wherein every possible quantum outcome is realised.
In many-worlds, the subjective appearance of wavefunction collapse is explained by the mechanism of quantum decoherence. By decoherence, many-worlds claims to resolve all of the correlation paradoxes of quantum theory, such as the EPR paradox[7][8] and Schrödinger’s cat,[1] since every possible outcome of every event defines or exists in its own “history” or “world”. In layman’s terms, there is a very large—perhaps infinite[9]—number of universes, and everything that could possibly have happened in our past, but didn’t, has occurred in the past of some other universe or universes.

basis of the calm repporter as derived from research of Eouropean Media expertise at the fronteirs of the approaches used by MEDIA PHILOSOPHY
from Paul Bruntons type MEDIA philosophy , while he was a soldier in the British army

as the inventor of MEDIATIONS by MEDIA between the right and wrongs in the sides to take as the good and the bad
and the data as true or false as well as the developements of positive data or negative outcomes.

of EARTH and its repport media Journalism at high rates.
WAR JOURNALISM at the new fronteir

please take note that the BROWN mentioned in the Youtube video is not the same person as Paul Brunton.

the basis of a scifi type series based on a private agent in space
or as the type of investigator working far away in another star system and being accompanied by a type WATSON mix with Chewbakka
as the basic inquiry into the future as is in a space scifi type setting
as well as presenting the current Earth situations with probable wars in space as a historical fact
the presentation here is of the type early detections of problems as based on a GIFT or as a type Vergance in the force where all inquiry gets routed to a artificial computer that does the deductive work.
.much like K9 from Dr Who
the question posed to you , the media public is: IS THIS FORMAT of REPRESENTATION too long or TOO SHORT
as in PAUL BRUNTONS own words
the short ants path is mutual
but the long one relies on cooperation


If space is a defensive manouvre
there will be winners and loosers

the basic representations of the reasons for mistakes , serious or accidental all have their causes
basically the early fase of space explorations with projective investigations of type Artificial Intelligence of a deductive relativity

or the basic JEDI

as a follower of the way of the force.


.”With all of us may the Force be, and may the peace of this temple be ours, a place open to thought and speech, a realm of mutual respect, and a haven of shared noble purpose. Let us take these seats together, with no one above the others. May we work together, free from the restraints of ego and jealousy, at this gathering and all others to come.”
―Jedi Council Members speaking the traditional oath during the Gathering[src]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s