QUEST for economics of the future: sci fi economy of all the future technologies in present developements

Articel on economics as relates to the discussion with
DAVID HARLEY
By Henryk Szubinski

the OVERSELF ON MARS the LUNAR OVERSELF and general considerations for the non usage of forks which were a POLISH ROYAL INVENTION in relations to the JAGELLONIA LINE and its interactions with the ITALIAN families of the Ritchest MEDICII families that introduced the concept of a adaptation on the old formats of using only a KNIFE to Eat with
.
.
.As a FORK is a problem in outer space the consumptions are based on fluid types of availablity which would have problems with FORKED ECONOMICAL TYPES
.
.
here is a vodeo of the H2O and the availability of fluid NUTRIENTS crucial for the future of space explorations
.
.

the food stuffs can also be seen in some of the segents in the GOODNEWS ” we have …contact .etc ”

.
.
.

4 freedooms
5th freedoom of knowledge moovement
Chordis6
the 7th framework Chordis7
.
.
.

.
.
some residual data that made me think and come up with this type of economical concept
Besides the video as courtesy of Youtube
the data is my own analisis
as a SCI FI TYPE ANALISIS based on FORKS
.
.

article on the economical problems of a type projective where 1/2 the world investements = to the basis of a knowledge base as defining the types of forks in the road of developements
in such a way the the data on the problems used to push the envelope into the background will all usage of excessess as the definitions of a economical link to a difference of the investement in returns by the basics of the types of sector in the market economy as based on the non loss by time as well as the non loss by a time investement = to the basis of a projected centrality
This would define the response on the availability of the types of aquired and accessed values based on the conservations of the basics of the NEW economical formats that use non trigonometrical computations but are 3 parallell responsive
= ///
as such the basicw of the data on why the values should relate to the minimal inclusives of investements by alterations of the types of argumented realitry and the problems of stemmic based relations of a ALTERATIONS of the traditional TRST value systems and the data on how to use a back up system for a economical problem without involvements from the sector that concerns itself with the conceptualities of the thought that makes the type of advancive investements of a ALTER format other than the MINIMAL ECONOMICAL MODELS BASED ON a CHARITABLE relational STATE..
As such the futrue looks a lot like the Deniability sectors and their types of 3 S + vector Tangents
= 3 basis of Tan values so that the SIN values and their Cosines are not used
But as a basic type of relations in economy where the basis of the data on the certainties in the VARAITE market is not involved as a PET product type of the basis of RECYCLING the products and their refferenced divisives to find a supeer symmetry of the closest vector proximity to investements and the types of FORK + FORK = a LINK in the economy
.
.what Harvey is definig is the space prescence of the future of the Earths economy in SPACE
as the future of EXPLORATION and the TECHNOLOGICAL POSSIBILITIES

above the Earth and the OBSERVATIONAL mode of approach to Earth economy by the type VARITE
varite is a divisive connotation with the meaning being a mixture of INTEREST articles, FACINATIONAL products and the assortement types that are response motivated by a emotional stimulii contextuality
.
.
.

how the basics of a view on a level that makes thee comparative of the main motivations for a EARTH based relation to space explorers as based on the variance of VARITE contextuality of the main HUMAN INVESTEMENTS of the STIMULII types that have problems in relations to the economics of human MAIN MOTIVATIONS of the types of data that are not OBSERVABLE ABLE to be related with HUMANS who have been engaged with SPACE EXPLORATIONS on how to define the relationships of a discussion as centred about the types of RELATIVE 2 nd person superfulous related to contexts of a NO GO SITUATIONS of the future of the STIMULII CENTRED ECONOMICAL types when the basis of its reppresentation makes use of the types of height levels in relations to a altered HEIGHT FORCE
.
.
.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s