ultraordinary states of awareness

the ultraordinary state

birth matrices water symbiotic environments stimulus of body motion by learning stimulus learning stimulous learning fold wisdom fold wisdom fold known dimensions of knowledge limitlessness on the limits of the thinkable

 

 

 

Europeiska flaggan

4 freedooms

the 5th  freedoom of knowledge moovement

Chordis6

The 7th framework Chordis7

 

 

play simultaneously to understand

the basics of a primary attempt at the exit scenario from a state of isolation = the same types of vector as were the problem  that cased the types of Shrödinger responses to the cat experiment on the basis of becoming the cat by association and imagining that a human has enetered its dimension in several cases the cat also will at some point leran to not spill the acid in its cage

This basic impulse is usually too late so that a responsive learning by evolution could imply that had there been a cat mother with the cat and a cat father, the resultant observations of the cat as having dimished its chances of survival = to the presence of the human between the 2 as

2/ S = x +1 as the evolutionary state of the fase where the human enters the room and the trick on how to avoid spilling the acid is learnt

.the cat is basically in a cage dissrregardles of how long it is there and how many generations have been reduced by the accident

the value of acid to Water as H2O could have been a contributive value in human evolutions as the basic divisions of the influences of some fluid susbtance through the thought functionings of how to learn by associating with the dangerous type of fluids

.

.

.

the advantage of travelling by conbsciousness is based on the foetus and the experience of the Pregancy as the vechicularity of the thought experience

 

 

The basics of multiple usage are defined and trained by Stanislaw Grof as the usage of breathing for the laternate gender side so that the transpersonal realm = the basics of the emotive stimulous of the Birthing as well as the types of stimulous experiences that are divisive by the NOW TIME and the PROJECTIVE time

Had the cat learnt how to advance long enough it would know that the greater the  aquirive value of H2O = to the lessened amount of acid such as NaOH

But there is a way by which the basis of enterance into the room is controllable by the same value in a state where the body or human associated with the act of enterance would be in a NON ENERGY usage state , the state of basic sleeping or of the same event that the cat has learnt to avoid.

.The Shrödinger concept from the point of view of the human intelligence that started this argument¨¨

¨THE CATS WORLD WOULD BE FILLED WITH ACID AND THE HUMANS WORLD WOULD BE FILLED WITH WATER UPTO THE POINT WHERE THE HUMAN ENTERS AND THE WATER FLOWS INTO AND OUTOF ONE OF THE 2 IN THE SPECIAL CASE THE HUMAN SWALLOWS THE ACID AND THE CAT HAS A EXTRA DIMENSIONAL CHANCE AT READAPTTATION BEYOND THE BASIC CONFRONTATION BY 1/2 A PROBLEM

basically the cat would have to think how many atoms of NaOH and how many atoms of H2O are divisive to the resultance of

1/2 H2O + 1/2 NaOH ——————–>2NaOH-  1/4 H2O

.It is a type of reductionality of the product that repeats the same resultance but used again and again upto the point of differenciation

This formulation states that the 1/2 is multiplied by another 1/2 and so on

the amount of atoms in H2O are not  4

but there is some specific H2O interactions with the cat noone theless If it wants to evolve, that is…

.

.

Origin and motivation

Schrödinger’s thought experiment was intended as a discussion of the EPR article, named after its authors — EinsteinPodolsky, and Rosen — in 1935.[1] The EPR article had highlighted the strange nature of quantum entanglement, which is a characteristic of a quantum state that is a combination of the states of two systems (for example, two subatomic particles), that once interacted but were then separated and are not each in a definite state. The Copenhagen interpretation implies that the state of the two systems undergoes collapse into a definite state when one of the systems is measured.

Schrödinger and Einstein had exchanged letters about Einstein’s EPR article, in the course of which Einstein had pointed out that the state of an unstable keg ofgunpowder will, after a while, contain a superposition of both exploded and unexploded states.

To further illustrate the putative incompleteness of quantum mechanics, Schrödinger applied quantum mechanics to a living entity that may or may not be conscious. In Schrödinger’s original thought experiment, he describes how one could, in principle, transpose the superposition of an atom to large-scale systems of a live and dead cat by coupling cat and atom with the help of a “diabolical mechanism”. He proposed a scenario with a cat in a sealed box, wherein the cat’s life or death was dependent on the state of a subatomic particle. According to Schrödinger, the Copenhagen interpretation implies that the cat remains both alive and dead (to the universe outside the box) until the box is opened.

Schrödinger did not wish to promote the idea of dead-and-alive cats as a serious possibility; quite the reverse, the paradox is a classic reductio ad absurdumcitation needed. The thought experiment serves to illustrate the bizarreness of quantum mechanics and the mathematics necessary to describe quantum states. Intended as a critique of just the Copenhagen interpretation (the prevailing orthodoxy in 1935), the Schrödinger cat thought experiment remains a topicaltouchstone for all interpretations of quantum mechanics. How each interpretation deals with Schrödinger’s cat is often used as a way of illustrating and comparing each interpretation’s particular features, strengths, and weaknesses.

File:MWI Schrodingers cat.png

 

 

The quantum-mechanical “Schrödinger’s cat” paradox according to the many-worlds interpretation. In this interpretation every event is a branch point; the cat is both alive and dead, irrespective of whether the box is opened, but the “alive” and “dead” cats are in different branches of the universe, both of which are equally real, but which cannot interact with each other.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s