what i did here is to refer the problems of quantum consciousness to the related subject of the andromeda galaxy by a advancement in the scopic usage of a type astrophysics programme with some basic divisions of the matter related theme to the geometry used.
as the existance of the general amount of galaxies that are
/// 3 parallells in angle of force inclination by the same types of /// 3 F values on the basics of seperation so that the whole sequence of events is a basic level of the data on the fase STARTS of their related to y values and x values in the z axial field of a basic SEARCH expansion to combine parallells:
.a basic WIGGLE on the amount of z value compensations in basic +/- 1 degree which recognises similarities by their opposed swing moments:
pre work concept by Henryk Szubinski
The 3-fold Way and Consciousness Studies
K. Korotkov, A. Levichev
Part I. Biological fields and Quantum Mechanical representations
I.1. Conventional Quantum Mechanical representations.
I.2. Chronometric development of QM and the DLF-perspective.
I.3. Fields of biological subjects.
Part II. Penrose-Hameroff approach to quantum mechanics as the
foundation for a theory of consciousness
II.1. Discussion of some quantum-mechanical topics involved
II.2. Quantum coherence, quantum computation, and where to seek the
physical basis of mind
II.3. The Penrose-Hameroff Orchestrated Objective Reduction model
II.4. DLF-approach implanted into Penrose-Hameroff model
Part III. Segal�s Chronometry and its LF-development
III.1. Segal�s Chronometric Theory: a brief overview.
III.2. Space-times L, F are on equal footing with D; the list is now
III.3. Can the New Science be based on the DLF-triad?
Part IV. Emergence of New Science and the GDV Bioelectrography
IV.1. The three worlds have been known to humanity since ancient
IV.2. Is Direct Vision an example of L-phenomenon?
on equal footing, essentially, with the spacetime D (as if the three worlds form a single object; hence, the 3–fold way). Are there mathematical grounds to …
(1) x2 + y2 + z2 = C2t2
The expression in the left side is the distance squared between (0,0,0) and (x, y, z).
Mathematically, C is a positive constant independent of an observer. It is interpreted
as the speed of light. The equation (1) determines a surface which is called a light
cone (with vertex O).
Recall that the classical mechanics is based on the Newtonian world.
Return now to the space-time M. Clearly, an arbitrary event may be chosen as O.
In other words, there is not just one cone. Rather, there is a light cone with vertex at
each event. Such a cone is obtained from the cone (1) via translation (by a suitable
four-dimensional vector). This system of cones is of fundamental importance,
geometrically. It is known how to deduce special relativity in terms of that system
(and in terms of transformations which preserve that system of cones), see [AO-53]
The publication [Le-03] is not easily understood since it uses an up-to-date
geometrical apparatus of modern theoretical physics. Formally, [Le-03] contains six
theorems. It is possible, however, to present its main content more briefly (with a
minor mathematical rigor sacrifice). To do so, let us notice that the totality of all (the
above introduced) parallel translations forms a �group of transformations�. This
group can be identified with the world M, itself.
QUESTION: are there OTHER transformation groups which preserve the same
system of light cones?
ANSWER: YES, there are exactly three more – D, L, F.
Remark (for a reader with the knowledge of Lie algebras). The respective Lie
algebras are u(2), osc, u(1,1) (in that order). The Minkowski world M corresponds to
the simplest (= abelian) Lie algebra. Clearly, we speak of four-dimensional Lie
algebras (there are infinitely many of those).