Mars weight scale …probe droid

the form and internals

By Henryk Szubinski

basis of the scale as measurement by the process of its moovement on a level or irregular surface as will be known on EARTH as specific weight without alternations and using this value x as the difference the weight scale makes with the amount of motion of the human to be weighed as a time interval of the process relations with the pre point of EARTH data and the positional alterations on Mars surface as gravity in irregularity…

1) type 1 H2O ( f) stability by the process of 180 degree alterations by motion KICKING

2) the process scale or weight measurement goes 180 and is stepped on as a measure of weight by registration

3) the formats for the occular definitionings of the comparatives 180 / 3 = F of the process prime relations of the measurement

as the occular LINKUP to the objectives used for registrations such as the Andromeda

the process is coupled to the data on MUltiple Universes as the process level 1 ) and the subsequent non usage by qualifications…

as Grecian ancient formats of FORM and its value in force

the data on a string level = to a waveform in the process of displacements of human bipedic motiion:

the data is a format for the string /2 = S Earth to parameter

so that the value S1 and the value S2 = to the weight specifications as they were and without alterations in the basic space parameter and its subjective observations of the data by predefined relational references…

The body mass index (BMI), or Quetelet index, is a statistical measure of body weight based on a person’s weight and height. Though it does not actually measure the percentage of body fat, it is used to estimate a healthy body weight based on a person’s height. Due to its ease of measurement and calculation, it is the most widely used diagnostic tool to identify weight problems within a population, usually whether individuals are underweight, overweight or obese. It was invented between 1830 and 1850 by the Belgian polymath Adolphe Quetelet during the course of developing “social physics”.^[1] Body mass index is defined as the individual’s body weight divided by the square of his or her height. The formulae universally used in medicine produce a unit of measure of kg/m². BMI can also be determined using a BMI chart,^[2] which displays BMI as a function of weight (horizontal axis) and height (vertical axis) using contour lines for different values of BMI or colors for different BMI categories.

SI units
Imperial units

A graph of body mass index is shown above. The dashed lines represent subdivisions within a major class. For instance the “Underweight” classification is further divided into “severe”, “moderate”, and “mild” subclasses.
Based on World Health Organization data here.

If you could not see or know why scales are forms of measurment of the same thing in its full image this will sound like a question

space age question: where are you going

processing the spaceage question

Where are you going

By Henryk Szubinski

a)

data on alterations by similarity = minimal angle x / 2

length format

angle x 180 + 4 x(4L) = 8 x L

process buildup by proof of inccorporated format Force = maintainement

b) format h = data S+S

= 2S ( x + h)

process will format and maintain very large numbers = G

c)

data 3 S displacements as data on responses of

vector IN = vector OUT

= L / 2 (2) = L

process is

3S/3S = 1

wavelength similarity and process STRING data displacers as

3S in process of addition where

Force = G x reductions

¨by basic 3S + 3S = 6S¨

as format multiple

4S will then = 8-6

4S =2

S= 2/4

data then, on 1 singular level h in rotation 180 degrees by 7 rotations = 700 + 570 = 1270 / 6h

basics then ,on similarity in relations of alter sided processess as difference

h 1 and h2 = data 8S + x

ecological carefullness .saving everything with type 1,2,3 tech…and so on ..lunar bases

some drawings on LUNAR base concepts

and supplements on alternate projects

By Henryk Szubinski

some basic moon base drawings on some boosters for lunar vechicles as well as some drawings i made on process shareing which involves a old process of mixing inhabitance with minimal habitants in a shared format that is resultance towards a multiple brancheing for settlement constructs..

similar to

The Bell Aerosystems Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) was an Apollo Project era program to build a simulator for the Moon landings. The LLRVs, humorously referred to as “flying bedsteads”, were used by the FRC, now known as the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, at Edwards Air Force Base, California, to study and analyze piloting techniques needed to fly and land the Apollo Lunar Module in the moon’s low gravity environment.^[1]

some basic boosters i developed with their own parameters in a 3 D reality will work like pairing of their rotatability on a S value alteration to define shock absorbtion as well as the basics of their responsive values of external and internal type rotational responses in multi rotational directiuons.

Lunar vechicle base EJECTOR for hangar type usage of IMPULSe and angular momentum

defines the fractured relations of very cold temperatures and their usage on isocelees triangle basis where the shattered remains of H2O (s) states are used for quantal G number basis in very quiet modulations as related to H2O type 1,2,3 usage TECH relators

some supplement data on the ICE problem

and possible scenarios to save it

process fracture of the ice sheets on Polar regions = the data on a singular value reease or non inclusion in the process 2 x = 4 parameters of F H2O so that the value on a singular basis = 2 x F

general definitions of a stage 4 in process by sequenced reductions of the polar responsive value = 4 in pre melt process and post melt process as is in the resultance context of a responsive fold on the action = reaction

= 8 processess in a format resultance of 2 F or its fold as the section puzzle = a 2x multiple on the whole freeze level where such processess = 2x Freeze level = volume H2O / amount of normal ice covering

= TO THE BASIS OF THE 2X SECTION BEING PART OF THAT RESULTANCE

the data on levels 1 to 4 are the same as the data presented at the start with thoose numbers

in the formats of

1) H2O (s)

2)H2O(l)

3)H2O ( g)

4)H2O(p)

as one of the formats defined as the process that will conclude the data with stage 2 = 2 x F or its

resultance of a multi volume of state H2O = plasma or its end fase and as such its end value volume without loss.

the problem of frozen plasma in motion might be the fault of the large vessles that traull or displace through the polar regions that are made of Fe as a type plasma state solid in what is for the Earth a non plasma state in disruptive processess of earths geo magnetic field…

as would be on any planet Mars for example

supplement 2)

the reporting process: and the over qualified theoretics of a Mars or Lunar also a Earth type repporting system out amongst the stars

also a article alteration for the quote of a famous theoretical astrophysicist who saiys that the sci fi reality will have to be a format of the future:

Based on such quotes the news article is reffered to the work submitted on theese pages as about 2000 and the work is continuing as the type quote reference category in what a newspaper philosophy defines as the examples cited by reference to the type of categories of what sci fi can do.

To use theese articles is not to dwelw into a newspaper for mat that dissincludes the work of a multiple reference it is simply the process of using my own work and to define it in the context of such

freedoom as is solely possible by the theories of the Philosophy of a process Quest in short formats of its basis in basis of data level as is compliance to such definitions of a single person myself Henryk Szubinski running the newspaper ,not with the repportive journalism of alternate individuals as is the basis of newspaper work, but to define

the usability of a medial format in its highest possible category of being the related data on my own terms and computative fame as is and can be

used with a Quest………………………………………… for a basis in higher responses as is termed the peoples right repporting on peoples rights.(overself)appended later due to context scrutinty and work on subsequent philosophy of a OBI WAN BEN KENOBI: repporter..

supplement 3)

stop motion Force fields

By Henryk Szubinski.

warp drives as usable by

data on the parameters of their comparative measurements where everything in  the universe is in full motion

data  on a A.I animative programme for any force or plasma combination

Stopp motion and time lapse in outerspace expands its universe by such processess that replace the old value systems of astrophysical theoretics with the basics of a high velocity multiple value usability.

The data on the Andromeda galaxy and its image system:

data 1/4 =( 1/8 e.r +1) 4F

4 F x = S

S/4 = velocity

4x = G super stability

1/4 F = 4 ( 1+  force field 1/4x)

where e.r =EXACTED ROOM

THE VALUES OF A CAUSAL REFERENCE

in the data on super stability

and the force field projectability

basics here define the process by which the relational positions of the process to define the reasons for a static relationship to all objectives in the proximity to or in proximity by Force in the Universe as is based on the data that defines the relations of each paramater.

SUPPLEMENT 4

THE usage of clipp frames for stability of rail ejections of vechicle TUGGS as well as spaceship freighting between volumes

By Henryk Szubinski

formats for the process in the data on the value of the general difference between

3 levels as their process value angle diagonal S = 3 A / diameter (S)

in which the process

= 2 A

So that data on the basis of format S

displace multiple = 3 motion vectors of

the (A1 + diagonal x) = minimal diagonality

in (3A + vector reductions )

on Dimensional process width = A2 ( width ) x A3 ( width)

= w .A 6

and its process expansions &/or reductions by data on

h+L = b / vol

So h = (b/vol) + L

L= ( b/ vol)-h

General process derived value resultance of the Theory of all bases in outer space

L.b.w as well as Vol, Vector, Area

=[Vol 10 / 6 S = 6A]

basis of data is as follows

( Vol 2 ) + ( vol 3 ) + ( vol 4 ) + ( vol 1) = Vol 10

process high reduction multiples / Vol

+ formats for process as the rectangularity of its rotatability in cubic reference to a quadratic cubic in Vol rectangularity

+ ( vol 4 )Vol 4 = Vol squ 16

snowball universe

universe snow ball

By Henryk Szubinski

basically HOKI formats of 100 000 galaxies in basic BIT zones will relate to each other by 3 such zones

where the total sum = 15 billion light years

basically the growth of a super sized snowball will at its stage of rotataion and snow adhesion peel off the amount of ice in such amounts that the peel opens the spacetime parameter just like a snowball will peel off a largerr zone of snow for each turn…meaning that the end fase will peel of the same amount as will instantly melt and flow through the open HOT state and remain in flow through what is defined as the GALAXY flow state of type 1 H2O

basic formats for the data on the levels of 1/4 F as in the increase by AREA and volume x 4

where the basics of the volume /4 Areas

= the 3 to the 4 values of the amount of rotataional peeling:

This data will then define the process as = h of the

3 to the 4 (h) = 2 F

or F squared

the problems of a height value relation with thermally open holes in space time are difficult to define when the process = the differences of action &/or reactions of their related usage of heat or cold to define where the heat or its cold has been used for the force to have a conservational theory.

no ghoul or moghul

no Moghul

By Henryk Szubinski

take the wether with you where  there are ghouls and wind fantasms, advice from the spacetime…

locator of humans on exo planets

ancients of  ancient republics

By Henryk Szubinski

ON THE PROGRAMMABILITY OF STARSYSTEMS AND THEIR EXO PLANETS AS A 1 SEQUENCED RESPONSE TO THE TYPES OF INVESTIGATIVE SEQUENCE THAT IS ACTIVATED IN THE PROCESS TO ACCESS ROUTE A SPECIFIC PLANET IN THE EXO PLANETARY ZONE

the time value will later be defined

t=1

what is known of in Ancient republican formats  as being once on EARTH or In a exo planet can be defined by the programme presented here courtesy of WIKIPEDIA

the basis for the following arguments

basis surround of the space port in such parameters by the  type of STATUES

surrounded by the type of STRUCTURES

as well as the types of   TOOLS

also the types of minimal structures

the data on theese types will not use them , its basically a Philosophical argument against the usage of such formats solely on the Historical context, it is rater a NOW process for locating a human on a exo planet:

The following data is of a Philosophical format:

The probability that there was a geo monopolar reference by using the values of SAND ALONE as the measure for a similarity of ICE POLARITY in its multiple states, then the basis of a spaceport into and outof the LOCATION defined as being there would also be supported by the data on ANCIENT WIZARDS AND SORCERORS that kept the trade routes by foot alone.

the amount of planetary systems would be vector definitions define the vector values of their x values

from x 1 to x2 and the interactions of x3 and x4 so that the x 5 and x6 can be the vector values that use

x1 + x2 = the value to the left of a sphere of force

x3+x4 = the values of interactive indecies of a spherical force

x5+x6 = the value vectors to the right of a spherical

theese represent the data on how the sphere was first defined in relations to their processes amounts = 6 F

the value then would be a 2/4 or 1/2 value in advance of the process to define a rotataional value 2 F

where the 4 F = to the basics of the divisive 1/2

The reason for the usage of the process by which the additional value and the general process of the full amount of planetary systems in lim x = 1 x 10 to the 10

as such the general format of the data that defines the levels of their 1 /2 value divisives on the process to define such a vector

1 + x / 2 – F

the process can then be used to define the levels at which a process definition of 1/2 = R

on a 2x basis as the general data of the

Force by

x1 R /x2 F = a alternation of the basics in dissonance for the value alterations by

x1 R +1 / x2 F+1

= the basics of sustainements of vector interactions = S of the level planarity in which the vectors x3 and x4 are defined by the divisives of height and Volume=3

(x1R+1) h/ (x2 F+1)3

this will define the multiples then in 3 Dimensions where t =1

the philosophical arguemnts for the left mid and right formats of a philosophical formulation theory would be defined as being so apparent that the spherical force would be even much more so; resultance of this theory will then define no loss of data on the basis of making displacement on a spherical force or surface

basic PHILOSOPHY OF APPARENCY

Interface apparency refers to the degree to which the user interface enables a user to understand hidden contingencies within a computer system; in other words, how easy it is for a person coming upon an interface (a website, a computer program, or a kiosk) to understand the sequence of steps to perform a complex action using that interface.

Spatial visualization ability helps to predict which users will be bothered by low levels of apparency in an interface; the higher a person’s spatial visualization ability, the less trouble he or she will have with an interface with hidden dependencies.

a hidden dependancie will here be defined as your choice of planet in the catalogue

[edit]Introduction

Alonso and Norman (1998) define interface apparency as visually showing hidden relationships in the interface. In situations where certain options are unavailable or greyed-out, it may be unclear what circumstances would allow those options to be available. For instance, if one is using a text editor, the “Delete” option may be unavailable because no text is selected, or if no text is on the clipboard, “Paste” may be greyed-out.

the paste or grey out value will be locateed as the planet value by:

[edit]Recommendations

Having hidden dependencies between actions in an application is generally a bad idea; increasing the apparency of a website or piece of

application software

categories as the general catlogue

Application software, also known as an application, is

computer software = (A-B)

designed to help the user =(C-D)

to perform singular or multiple related specific tasks. Examples include enterprisesoftware,=(E-G)

accounting software, = (H-J)

office suites, =(K-L)

graphics software=(M-N)

and media players.=(O-Q)

Application software is contrasted with

system software=(R-S)

and

middleware,=(T-V)

which manage and integrate a computer’s capabilities, but typically do not directly apply them in the performance of tasks that benefit the user. A simple, if imperfect

analogy=(W-Z)

in the world of hardware would be the relationship of an electric light bulb (an application) to an electric power generation plant (a system).

should improve performance for all users.

On the t=1 basis then; the combined values are:

as simple as the scrolling mechanisms for the usage of category searches under any data level for comparative boosting

so that the  WASP 18 system with a search on a specific of INTERFACE APPARENCY will use category systems to locate a astronaut on such a system as the point reference position of the alphabet position = W

t=1

the data will use analogy as the category under which most of the data on BIO ANALOGOUS data is defined in its sections dissregardless of the aphabet apparency and the usage of the APPARANCY MONITOR SYSTEM FOR BIO FORMATS

..

.

basically defining the type SPACEPORT access route into a computive monitor by what is defined as a trade route meaning in ANALOGY that the process is totally unknow, what is known however is that someone is using the type of tech that is accessed and that this can be a trade route into ANALOGY of a totally known process INTERFACE APPARENCY

Planet Data Table

Planets in multiple-planet systems are highlighted in yellow.

Star	Planet	Mass (Compared to Jupiter)	Mass Error Margin	Radius (Compared to Jupiter)	Orbital period (days)	Semimajor axis (AU)	Orbital eccentricity	Inclination (°)	Discovery year
WASP-26	b	1.02	±0.03	1.32	2.7566	0.040	0	82.5	2010
WASP-1	b	0.89	±0.2	1.358	2.51997	0.0382	0	83.9	2006
HAT-P-16	b	4.193	±0.094	1.289	2.77596	0.0413	0.036	86.6	2010
Upsilon Andromedae	b	0.672	±0.056	–	4.617136	0.0595	0.013	≥30	1996
Upsilon Andromedae	d	10.29	–	–	1302.61	2.55	0.232	–	1999
WASP-18	b	10.43	±0.4	1.165	0.9414518	0.02047	0.0088	86	2009
HD 15082	WASP-33b	<4.1	–	1.497	1.2198669	0.02555	–	87.67	2010
HD 17156	b	3.212	−0.082 / +0.069	1.023	21.21688	0.1623	0.6753	86.2	2007
WASP-11/HAT-P-10	b	0.460	±0.028	1.045	3.7224690	0.0439	0	88.5	2008
Epsilon Eridani	b	1.55	±0.24	–	2502	3.39	0.702	30.1	2000
WASP-22	b	0.56	±0.02	1.12	3.53269	0.0468	0.023	89.2	2010
XO-3	b	11.79	±0.59	1.217	3.1915239	0.0454	0.26	84.2	2007
HAT-P-15	b	1.946	±0.066	1.072	10.863502	0.0964	0.190	89.1	2010
2M J044144	b	7.5	±2.5	–	–	15	–	–	2010
Beta Pictoris	b	8	−2 / +5	–	~6000	12	–	–	2008
WASP-12	b	1.41	±0.1	1.83	1.091435	0.0229	0.049	83.1	2008
COROT-12	b	0.917	−0.065 / +0.070	1.44	2.828042	0.04016	0.070	85.48	2010
COROT-7	b	0.0151	±0.0025	0.150	0.853585	0.0172	0	80.1	2009
COROT-7	c	0.0264	±0.0028	–	3.698	0.046	0	–	2009
COROT-5	b	0.467	−0.024 / +0.067	1.388	4.0378962	0.04947	0.09	85.83	2008
COROT-1	b	1.03	±0.12	1.49	1.5089557	0.0254	0	85.1	2007
COROT-4	b	0.72	±0.08	1.19	9.20205	0.090	0	90	2008
COROT-13	b	1.308	±0.066	0.885	4.03519	0.051	0	88.02	2010
COROT-14	b	7.6	±0.6	1.09	1.51214	0.027	0	79.6	2010
HAT-P-9	b	0.78	±0.09	1.4	3.92289	0.053	0	86.5	2008
XO-4	b	1.72	±0.2	1.34	4.12502	0.0555	0	88.7	2008
XO-5	b	1.077	±0.037	1.089	4.1877539	0.0487	0	86.8	2008
XO-2	b	0.57	±0.06	0.973	2.615838	0.0369	0	≥88.58	2007
HAT-P-13	b	0.851	−0.046 / +0.029	1.28	2.91626	0.0426	0.021	83.4	2009
55 Cancri	d	4.8	–	–	5169	5.74	0.014	53	2002
WASP-13	b	0.46	−0.0019 / +0.0017	1.21	4.35298	0.0527	0	86.9	2008
HD 80606	b	3.94	±0.11	1.029	111.43637	0.449	0.93366	89.285	2001
WASP-19	b	1.15	±0.08	1.31	0.7888399	0.0164	0.02	80.8	2009
OGLE-TR-211	b	1.03	±0.2	1.36	3.67724	0.051	0	≥87.2	2007
OGLE-TR-132	b	1.14	±0.12	1.18	1.689868	0.0306	0	85	2003
OGLE-TR-113	b	1.32	±0.19	1.09	1.4324757	0.0229	0	89.4	2004
OGLE-TR-111	b	0.53	±0.11	1.067	4.0144479	0.047	0	88.1	2002
OGLE2-TR-L9	b	4.5	±1.5	1.67	2.48553417	0.0418	–	82.47	2008
OGLE-TR-182	b	1.01	±0.15	1.13	3.9791	0.051	0	85.7	2007
Gliese 436	b	0.072	±0.0025	0.438	2.643904	0.02872	0.150	85.8	2004
2M1207	b	4	−1 / +6	1.5	620000	41	–	–	2004
PSR B1257+12	A	0.000063	–	–	25.262	0.19	0	~50	1994
PSR B1257+12	B	0.013	–	–	66.5419	0.36	0.0186	53	1992
PSR B1257+12	C	0.012	–	–	98.2114	0.46	0.0252	47	1992
WASP-25	b	0.58	±0.04	1.26	3.76483	0.0474	0	87.7	2010
HAT-P-3	b	0.599	±0.028	0.890	2.899703	0.03894	0	87.24	2007
WASP-15	b	0.542	±0.05	1.428	3.7520656	0.0499	0	85.5	2008
HAT-P-12	b	0.211	±0.012	0.959	3.2130598	0.0384	0	–	2009
WASP-16	b	0.855	±0.059	1.008	3.1186009	0.0421	0	85.22	2009
WASP-14	b	7.725	−0.67 / +0.43	1.259	2.2437704	0.037	0.0903	84.79	2008
WASP-24	b	1.032	−0.037 / +0.038	1.104	2.3412083	0.0359	0	85.71	2010
Gliese 581	e	0.006104	–	–	3.14942	0.03	0	≥30	2009
Gliese 581	b	0.0492	–	–	5.36874	0.041	0	≥30	2005
Gliese 581	c	0.01686	–	–	12.9292	0.07	0.17	≥30	2007
Gliese 581	d	0.02231	–	–	66.8	0.22	0.38	≥30	2007
HAT-P-4	b	0.68	±0.04	1.27	3.056536	0.0446	0	89.9	2007
Lupus-TR-3	b	0.81	±0.18	0.89	3.91405	0.0464	0	88.3	2007
WASP-17	b	0.49	−0.056 / +0.059	1.66	3.7354417	0.051	0.129	87.8	2009
XO-1	b	0.9	±0.07	1.3	3.941534	0.0488	0	87.7	2006
1RXS J160929.1-210524	b	8	–	1.7		~330	–	–	2008
HD 147506	HAT-P-2b	9.09	±0.24	1.157	5.6334729	0.06878	0.5171	86.72	2007
PSR B1620-26	PSR B1620-26b	2.5	±1	~0.8	~36500	23	low	55	1993
HD 149026	b	0.359	−0.021 / +0.022	0.654	2.8758887	0.04313	0	85.3	2005
GJ 1214	b	0.0179	±0.00027	0.2415	1.5803925	0.0143	<0.27	88.62	2009
HAT-P-14	b	2.232	±0.059	1.15	4.6267669	0.0606	0.107	83.5	2010
OGLE-2005-BLG-071L	b	3.5	±0.3	–	3600	3.6	–	–	2005
OGLE-TR-10	b	0.63	±0.14	1.26	3.10129	0.04162	0	84.5	2002
GSC 03089-00929	TrES-3	1.92	±0.23	1.295	1.30619	0.0226	0	82.15	2007
OGLE-2006-BLG-109L	b	0.727	±0.06	–	1790	2.3	–	64	2008
OGLE-2006-BLG-109L	c	0.271	±0.022	–	4931	4.5	0.15	64	2008
GSC 02620-00648	TrES-4	0.919	±0.073	1.799	3.553945	0.05091	0	82.86	2006
MOA-2008-BLG-310L	b	0.23	±0.05	–	–	1.25	–	–	2009
OGLE-2005-BLG-390L	b	0.018	–	–	4800	2.6	–	–	2006
OGLE-2007-BLG-368L	b	0.0694	–	–	–	3.3	–	–	2009
OGLE-TR-56	b	1.29	±0.12	1.30	1.211909	0.0225	0	78.8	2003
SWEEPS J175853.92−291120.6	SWEEPS-04	3.8	–	0.81	4.2	0.055	–	≥87	2006
SWEEPS J175902.67−291153.5	SWEEPS-11	9.7	±5.6	1.13	1.796	0.03	–	≥84	2006
OGLE-2003-BLG-235L /MOA-2003-BLG-53L	b	2.6	±0.8	–	–	4.3	–	–	2004
OGLE-2005-BLG-169L	b	0.041	–	–	3100	2.7	–	–	2006
MOA-2007-BLG-192L	b	0.01	−0.005 / +0.015	–	–	0.62	–	–	2008
MOA-2007-BLG-400L	b	0.9	±0.4	–	–	0.85 or 7.5	–	–	2008
HAT-P-5	b	1.06	±0.11	1.26	2.788491	0.04075	0	86.75	2007
WASP-3	b	1.76	−0.14 / +0.06	1.31	1.846834	0.0317	0	85.06	2007
COROT-11	b	2.33	±0.34	1.43	2.99433	0.0436	0	83.17	2010
COROT-9	b	0.84	±0.07	1.05	95.2738	0.407	0.11	>89.9	2010
COROT-6	b	2.96	±0.34	1.166	8.887	0.0855	<0.1	–	2009
Kepler-8	b	0.603	−0.19 / +0.13	1.419	3.52254	0.0483	0	84.07	2010
Kepler-4	b	0.077	±0.012	0.357	3.21346	0.0456	0	89.76	2010
GSC 02652-01324	TrES-1	0.61	±0.06	1.081	3.030065	0.0393	0.135	88.2	2004
GSC 03549-02811	TrES-2	1.199	±0.052	1.272	2.47063	0.03556	0	83.62	2006
Kepler-7	b	0.433	−0.041 / +0.040	1.478	4.885525	0.06224	0	86.5	2010
COROT-10	b	2.75	±0.14	0.97	13.2406	0.1055	0.53	88.55	2010
COROT-8	b	0.22	±0.03	0.57	6.21229	0.063	0	88.4	2010
COROT-2	b	3.31	±0.16	1.465	1.7429964	0.0281	0	87.84	2007
HAT-P-7	b	1.8	−0.059 / +0.063	1.421	2.2047298	0.0379	0	84.1	2008
Kepler-6	b	0.669	−0.030 / +0.025	1.323	3.23423	0.04567	0	86.8	2010
HAT-P-11	b	0.081	±0.009	0.422	4.8878162	0.053	0.198	88.5	2009
Kepler-5	b	2.114	±0.064	1.431	3.54846	0.05064	0	86.3	2010
HD 189733	b	1.13	±0.03	1.138	2.2185733	0.03099	0.00	85.76	2005
WASP-2	b	0.914	±0.092	1.117	2.152226	0.03138	0	84.8	2006
WASP-7	b	0.96	−0.18 / +0.12	0.915	4.954658	0.0618	0	89.6	2008
HD 209458	b	0.685	−0.014 / +0.015	1.32	3.52474859	0.04707	0.07	86.677	1999
HAT-P-8	b	1.52	−0.16 / +0.18	1.5	3.07632	0.0487	0	87.5	2008
Gliese 876	d	0.021	±0.001	–	1.93778	0.02080665	0.207	50	2005
Gliese 876	c	0.7142	±0.0039	–	30.0881	0.12959	0.25591	48.07	2001
Gliese 876	b	2.2756	±0.0045	–	61.1166	0.208317	0.0324	48.93	1998
Gliese 876	e	0.046	±0.005	–	124.26	0.3343	0.055	59.5	2010
Fomalhaut	b	0.054–3.0	–	–	~320000	~115	~0.11	~66	2008
ADS 16402 B	HAT-P-1b	0.524	±0.031	1.225	4.4652934	0.0553	0.067-	86.28	2006
HR 8799	d	10	±3	1.2	~36500	24	~0	~0	2008
HR 8799	c	10	±3	1.2	~69000	38	~0	~0	2008
HR 8799	b	7	−2 / +4	1.1	~170000	68	~0	~0	2008
WASP-21	b	0.30	±0.01	1.07	4.322482	0.052	0	88.75	2010
WASP-6	b	0.503	−0.038 / +0.019	1.224	3.361006	0.0421	0.054	88.47	2008
WASP-10	b	3.06	−0.21 / +0.23	1.08	3.0927616	0.0371	0.057	86.8	2008
WASP-4	b	1.237	−0.079 / +0.087	1.365	1.3382282	0.0230	0	89.35	2007
WASP-28	b	0.91	±0.06	1.12	3.408821	0.0455	0.046	89.1	2010
HAT-P-6	b	1.057	±0.119	1.33	3.852985	0.05235	0	85.51	2007
WASP-29	b	0.248	±0.02	0.74	3.923	0.0456	0	87.96	2010
WASP-5	b	1.637	±0.082	1.171	1.6284246	0.02729	0	85.8	2007
WASP-8	b	2.23	–	1.17	8.16	0.0793	–	–	2008

The data on such vectors would be supported by the very high value of such a port  into spacetime..

Why such a parameter would be or has been the surround and scavange is part of the anthropology and philosophy from the GREEKS , the only Civilisation to have used the definition ANCIENT.

The basis of the planetary types and their shattered usage of a reference positional system

Exo planet drive robotics

exo planet DRIVE robotics

By Henryk Szubinski

If you take every argument to its rational conclusion; the types of investigations in dependance on the type 1 investigator of the process to locate a definite answer as concerns the problems of what to do in outer space spacetime: the arguments for a definite

answer is based on the general types of planets in habitable zones, their reference data as having the same angle of ecliptics and their polar regions are possible to locate, the only real problem is that the search for such planets or star systems would have to be based on the availability of the type twillight zone where most of the activity of a rotational moment actually occur at the same vector angle as the Earth, meaning that the rotattional moment would have to be the same in force as is the human drive ON EARTH to locate or be in the active process of locating a point reference for what is defined as the general drive for the process to locate DRIVE 2

This type 2 drive is based on the chance that the same vectors and the same vector angle as in Drive 1 = the process of TIME. Meaning that the values of type 2 robotic data would support the existance of a polar zone in much the same angles of relations as on Earth and its polar North and South values —————————->that this value would account for most of the drive of predictive robotics as beyond the twillight zone in such altered hemispherical values as would = the data on continuiim values that support predictive usage.

The only real format for such availability of a DELAY function in robotics would be defined as the process of a definite resultance.  Processing this data on the resultance in DRIVE 3 processess would define the data on Delay = data on the process of time as usage to make this event rotation at such specific angles in a rotatation about the same parameter as most EARTH type rotations are in cooincidence with the event DRIVE 3 = time where the process is a guarantee for human survival.

This DRIVE 3 = the variability of such processess in action as the values of a a non random but intelligence in action.

Meaning that ist DRIVE 4 is adaptable for the usage of such investigations to define the process of using TIME to make decisions processess on such habitable planets as is based on the solidity of type 1 H2O technology in ice cap polarities and their values of a forseeable future to define the law of REWARD of the human programmers that use the law of such investigations as the QUEST.

Basically It is theese project examples of a locatability within the basics of EARTH type similarity and the only process parameters that can define a future foir humman  usage or programmability that is a definite result of having located such a exo planet or star system

.

If 1 such format can be used to define a predictive value by using the 4 Drive formats, then the process on the surface of such a exo planet can be computed as being the derivable value that will define a non release function of such parameter ADHESIVE force types…

Such a exo planet would indicate by the power of FORCE, the amount of time wastage based on the prrobability that it is a similar type1 H2O technology that is being delayed in the same process as is being used to define the very minimal Force value as the steady stste relations of its process in the process of wasting time = the usage of H2O type 1 technology

this singularity = delay / time

= process 1 > the similarity

as the values to which a 1/4 value drive

= the data on diagonals and their value derived process 4 sides / time

this will define the resistance as basic and minimal as the value

=the data on the process of adhesions by a 3 x = 2 / 4 as

the advancive levels of using S2 – ( S3) =R4

or the basic 2 vectors that = 3 F

where the remaining 2 vector 3 x F = 1/2 of the value where the process

= 1/4 x F = 1/2

realising that the FORCE BIND formats are the way in and way out of a type tractions force that is in decimal value increases of the decimal value > type 1 for every response alteration made.

Meaning that the level > 1 has been reached.

by the process of x / values In and OUT

increases the certainty of >1 value relations

as such = a type 1 definite value of technological usage of H2O

the habitability force zone is actually a warp of the z space level where the motion about the z vector = to the dipp and ebb of data specifics for the exo planetary data and reference for the types of edge values where H2O similarity simulates the same angle alterations as well as the same edge values in what is defined as H2O type 1 elasticity is the basic particle state for the H2O as a flat edge warping of its 3 combined atoms.

flying car forward swept force ratios

function  flying car

By Henryk Szubinski

basics of a burner ring in the tail to axial or wrench type rotatability which will simulate action & / or reaction in Newtonian relations of Force by opposed vector motion.

basically like 2 skaters on a ice surface pushing towards each other, the motion results in seperation by the force vector opposition..

The data show below is basic to the type flying car structure and how the main rotator at the tail will flipp sides with the warped curvature that inccorporates the burner ring with its basic level of force opposition = compressability

and the basic truncated funnel for magnetic or turbine boosting of flow.

basically the whole format is a 1 S vector funnel

the data on the 2 string process = and the 1 / string = a very minimal value at the tail

=to the data on this value as the sum

S+ 2 strings (1 / string) = minimalised value( 1/4 ) F/4 responses

the basic usage of a tail axial manouvrability of the mid section near the tail as the type isolated turbine in light weight and made of a circumferencial type section: on its own it will not do much, but the detail functions by the magnetic sections in front of the Burner ring so that the power ratio is increased by the flow of burnable or flow vectorisation.

The general make up of the axial hold , basically the type wrench is supported by the warping from the tail to the main section so that the curvature will support the motion of the burner ring to its axial angle controllability..

Newton’s third law

Newton’s third law. The skaters’ forces on each other are equal in magnitude, but act in opposite directions.

“

Lex III: Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi.

”

“

To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction: or the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal and are directed in opposite directions.

”

A more direct translation than the one just given above is:

“

LAW III: To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts. — Whatever draws or presses another is as much drawn or pressed by that other. If you press a stone with your finger, the finger is also pressed by the stone. If a horse draws a stone tied to a rope, the horse (if I may so say) will be equally drawn back towards the stone: for the distended rope, by the same endeavour to relax or unbend itself, will draw the horse as much towards the stone, as it does the stone towards the horse, and will obstruct the progress of the one as much as it advances that of the other. If a body impinges upon another, and by its force changes the motion of the other, that body also (because of the equality of the mutual pressure) will undergo an equal change, in its own motion, toward the contrary part. The changes made by these actions are equal, not in the velocities but in the motions of the bodies; that is to say, if the bodies are not hindered by any other impediments. For, as the motions are equally changed, the changes of the velocities made toward contrary parts are reciprocally proportional to the bodies. This law takes place also in attractions, as will be proved in the next scholium.[29]

”

In the above, as usual, motion is Newton’s name for momentum, hence his careful distinction between motion and velocity.

The Third Law means that all forces are interactions between different bodies,^[30] and thus that there is no such thing as a unidirectional force or a force that acts on only one body. If body A exerts a force on body B, body B simultaneously exerts a force of the same magnitude on body A— both forces acting along the same line. As shown in the diagram opposite, the skaters’ forces on each other are equal in magnitude, but act in opposite directions. Although the forces are equal, the accelerations are not: the less massive skater will have a greater acceleration due to Newton’s second law. The two forces in Newton’s third law are of the same type (e.g., if the road exerts a forward frictional force on an accelerating car’s tires, then it is also a frictional force that Newton’s third law predicts for the tires pushing backward on the road).

Newton used the third law to derive the law of conservation of momentum;^[31] however from a deeper perspective, conservation of momentum is the more fundamental idea (derived via Noether’s theoremfrom Galilean invariance), and holds in cases where Newton’s third law appears to fail, for instance when force fields as well as particles carry momentum, and in quantum mechanics.

basically the vector curvature WARP upp = the basis of a Helix format in multiple branc format where the basis is the UPSIDE DOWN PROCESS in place of the  usual data as the brancehings into the trunk section as their externalised vectors outwards: this argumentation can be defined on a continuiim 22

as the end proof at level 22 as argumentative stage number and the collective evidence for the process of a brancheing being upside down…this type of data relies heavily on the argumantations of opposed values alos = to non work documant binding……or agreements of trust………upto the levels where the basic contract or documentation = level 22 as the opposed arguments for the system having its own A.I system and not as the opposed arguments that the branches are like a tree and cannot be upsidedown or think.This function will be defined as vector multiples that count the amounts of arguements against contract abuse as well as the amount of positive data on the sum value of their point system for the process.

This type of reference and relations of what bio formats in themselves experience can play a great role in the new species architecture developed by

Jhon M Johansen

The book Nanoarchitecture presents eleven of Johansen’s most inspired visions, offering an antidote to much of today’s form-driven practice. Michael Moran’s amazing model photos suggests what it would be like to inhabit these fantastic spaces.

John Johansen (b 1916) has been one of the preeminent architects in the United States for more than half a century. Since retiring from practice, Johansen has devoted himself to producing futuristic architecture that looks to the newest technologies science has to offer, from nanotechnology to magnetic levitation to material science, for its inspiration.

data on Johansen is used courtesy of

http://www.archspace.com