looper fast way to space

L O O P E R

By Henryk Szubinski

the type 1 jump from a state of the 2 ndary state of quantum mechanics in which the internal volumes as the density field and the secondary state of the level of the loop as immersed in its field theory as the types of levels to the base one .not as a totally immersed value but as a angle of dimensionality in its higher rate of reference to the way in or out of a state in full density where the basis of the top level =the full immersions as = to the top surface without LINKAGE to the state comparative with

levels 1,2,or 3 as its closest sustainable relation of motion along a area.

Accellerations on this level as the values take the definition of Shrödinger type relations where the basis of the process in a minimal MEZON link sequence = to the data on force as the formats of the interlinking of all 3 levels and their referenced plott on a vertical graphing system of the x intercies as the process by which the value vertical LINK = lift by anti matter in its force of the data on formats of the remaining volume quantality in a process of increase by the dynamics of a lower density cavity which is fully sealed but can be used where quantals can be inserted into the hull types without loss of the action and or reactions of the lift.

CMS Higgs-event.jpg

the type 3 level quantal input of a non influenced forced state of placeing anti matter relations to a surface faster than the input into a volume that would be dissipated by the states of processess wasting the input and output interferrances of the point touch process to lift.

parity as the relation to no parity of the halved value and its quantal root

the usage of a upside down touch point to  touch on the hull

If the universe were reflected in a mirror, most of the laws of physics would be identical—things would behave the same way regardless of what we call “left” and what we call “right”. This concept of mirror reflection is called parity (P). Gravity, the electromagnetic force, and the strong interaction all behave in the same way regardless of whether or not the universe is reflected in a mirror, and thus are said to conserve parity (P-symmetry). However, the weak interaction does distinguish “left” from “right”, a phenomenon called parity violation (P-violation).

Based on this, one might think that if the wavefunction for each particle (more precisely, the quantum field for each particle type) were simultaneously mirror-reversed, then the new set of wavefunctions would perfectly satisfy the laws of physics (apart from the weak interaction). It turns out that this is not quite true: In order for the equations to be satisfied, the wavefunctions of certain types of particles have to be multiplied by −1, in addition to being mirror-reversed. Such particle types are said to have negative or odd parity (P = −1, or alternatively P = –), while the other particles are said to havepositive or even parity (P = +1, or alternatively P = +).

For mesons, the parity is related to the orbital angular momentum by the relation:[7]

P = \left( -1 \right)^{L+1}

where the L is a result of the parity of the corresponding spherical harmonic of the wavefunction. The ‘+1’ in the exponent comes from the fact that, according to the Dirac equation, a quark and an antiquark have opposite intrinsic parities. Therefore the intrinsic parity of a meson is the product of the intrinsic parities of the quark (+1) and antiquark (−1). As these are different, their product is −1, and so it contributes a +1 in the exponent.

As a consequence, mesons with no orbital angular momentum (L = 0) all have odd parity (P = −1).

In theoretical physicsquantum geometry is the set of new mathematical concepts generalizing the concepts of geometry whose understanding is necessary to describe the physical phenomena at very short distance scales (comparable to Planck length). At these distances, quantum mechanics has a profound effect on physics.

Each theory of quantum gravity uses the term quantum geometry in a slightly different fashion. String theory, a leading candidate for a quantum theory of gravity, uses the term quantum geometry to describe exotic phenomena such as T-duality and other geometric dualities, mirror symmetrytopology-changing transitions, minimal possible distance scale, and other effects that challenge our usual geometrical intuition. More technically, quantum geometry refers to the shape of the spacetime manifold as seen by D-branes which includes the quantum corrections to the metric tensor, such as the worldsheet instantons. For example, the quantum volume of a cycle is computed from the mass of a brane wrapped on this cycle.

In an alternative approach to quantum gravity called loop quantum gravity (LQG), the phrase quantum geometry usually refers to the formalism within LQG where the observables that capture the information about the geometry are now well defined operators on a Hilbert space. In particular, certain physical observables, such as the area, have a discrete spectrum. It has also been shown that the loop quantum geometry is non-commutative.

It is possible (but considered unlikely) that this strictly quantized understanding of geometry will be consistent with the quantum picture of geometry arising from string theory.

Another approach, which tries to reconstruct the geometry of space-time from “first principles” is Discrete Lorentzian quantum gravity.

basis of the surface level horizon = type 1 as the process by which the functions of a input data specific comparative value of a fluid H2O type 1 state of matter that is based on the process by which t = the data on seperations of the values to which the values of the parameter definition = x

As the values used on the t=3 states of matter

in their primary values of a displacement vector horizon as non defined on the basis of the process usage of resistance =V/I

as the values to which the values on non density comparatives of the basis of a nodal frequency pulse that can be used in any bvector direction as the loop.

In a 3D format the loop particle theory prooves that the anti matter is ahead of the process by which the t = 4 as the 4th state plasma in relations to the process surface of a 3 sided triangle = isocelees by the values of a inner value area = volume in its higher process resultance of the nodality of a loop in which the input = output by the nodal avoidance of the 3rd state = to the process of susttaining a lift .

Loop quantum gravity (LQG), also known as loop gravity and quantum geometry, is a proposed quantum theory of spacetime which attempts to reconcile the theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Loop quantum gravity suggests that space can be viewed as an extremely fine fabric or network “weaved” of finite quantised loops of excited gravitational fields called spin networks. When viewed over time, these spin networks are called spin foam, which should not be confused with quantum foam. A major quantum gravity contender with string theory, loop quantum gravity incorporates general relativity without requiring string theory’s higher dimensions.

LQG preserves many of the important features of general relativity, while simultaneously employing quantization of both space and time at thePlanck scale in the tradition of quantum mechanics. The technique of loop quantization was developed for the nonperturbative quantization ofdiffeomorphism-invariant gauge theory. Roughly, LQG tries to establish a quantum theory of gravity in which the very space itself, where all other physical phenomena occur, becomes quantized.

LQG is one of a family of theories called canonical quantum gravity. The LQG theory also includes matter and forces, but does not address the problem of the unification of all physical forces the way some other quantum gravity theories such as string theory do.

plasma accellerations monitor

the plasma accellerator monitor

By Henryk Szubinski

THE BASIS OF THE INPUT FLOW AS A ELASTIC TUBE THAT CAN BE SURFACE BENT WITH THE INCREASE OF WEIGHT FROM THE OUTPUT OF THE HEATED WATER FLOW OUTWARDS FROM THE MAIN KETTLE AS = HEATED H2O

as such the flow is by heating derived from a circuit resistor as a non conductive super surface:

Basics of the universe and the type 1 H2O theory of the outlet = the warping of a inflow = outflow

based on data of the process by which the valye angle in its sin x angle = values in which the displacements in transferrance from the displacements beyond the resistance = to the force of a volumetrical value universal system for the process in the radial values = displacement / flow as force.

The data on the process by which the full exchangability of the fluid processess are defined to be the functionings of the tube reinsertions to function by a type process in which the definition of warpings of a anti matter drive = to the data on the sequencings of the values in their responsive volume increases towards a value in which a minimal difference of H2O states = 4th state in its accumulated values of heat as cycling into the accellerated force.

the basis of the swiggle as the string that will plasma simulate the exact similarity of a system continued to continually recycle the H2O into plasma by the values of gravity anti matter type of controll of the whole module simulated to a type 1 H2O similarity where the O module can be mooved into a squiggle warp of the active resultance = lift.

process stages of a H2O rotated plasma stage of the 6 anti particles:

Isospin and charge

Combinations of one u, d or s quarks and one u, d, or s antiquark in JP = 0configuration form a nonet.

Combinations of one u, d or s quarks and one u, d, or s antiquark in JP = 1configuration also form a nonet.

The concept of isospin was first proposed by Werner Heisenberg in 1932 to explain the similarities between protons and neutrons under the strong interaction.[13]Although they had different electric charges, their masses were so similar that physicists believed they were actually the same particle. The different electric charges were explained as being the result of some unknown excitation similar to spin. This unknown excitation was later dubbed isospin by Eugene Wigner in 1937.[14] When the first mesons were discovered, they too were seen through the eyes of isospin. The three pions were believed to be the same particle, but in different isospin states.

This belief lasted until Murray Gell-Mann proposed the quark model in 1964 (containing originally only the u, d, and s quarks).[15] The success of the isospin model is now understood to be the result of the similar masses of the u and d quarks. Since the u and d quarks have similar masses, particles made of the same number then also have similar masses. The exact specific u and d quark composition determines the charge, as u quarks carry charge +23 while d quarks carry charge −13. For example the three pions all have different charges (π+ (ud), π (a quantum superposition of uu and dd states), π (du)), but have similar masses (~140 MeV/c2) as they are each made of a total of pairs of up and down quarks and antiquarks. Under the isospin model, they were considered to be a single particle in different charged states.

The mathematics of isospin was modeled after that of spin. Isospin projections varied in increments of 1 just like those of spin, and to each projection was associated a “charged state“. Since the “pion particle” had three “charged states”, it was said to be of isospin I = 1. Its “charged states” π+π, and π, corresponded to the isospin projections I3 = +1, I3 = 0, and I3 = −1 respectively. Another example is the “rho particle“, also with three charged states. Its “charged states” ρ+ρ, and ρ, corresponded to the isospin projections I3 = +1, I3 = 0, and I3 = −1 respectively. It was later noted that the isospin projections were related to the up and down quark content of particles by the relation

I_3=\frac{1}{2}[(n_u-n_\bar{u})-(n_d-n_\bar{d})],

where the n’s are the number of up and down quarks and antiquarks.

In the “isospin picture”, the three pions and three rhos were thought to be the different states of two particles. However in the quark model, the rhos are excited states of pions. Isospin, although conveying an inaccurate picture of things, is still used to classify hadrons, leading to unnatural and often confusing nomenclature. Since mesons are hadrons, the isospin classification is also used, with I3 = +12 for up quarks and down antiquarks, and I3 = −12 for up antiquarks and down quarks.

does rerun = type 1 H2O

processess of envelopments in force

By Henryk Szubinski

data functionings of value to divisives of the full proto values

as data defined to effect the resimilations in processess = data on proton force

the basis of the value in its system value format surround = define value by the data = values by response to the process in active values of each section as the process in which the basics on full format diameters of a force field processor:

Data on the basics in which the dissimilarity by processess of type 1 H2O the basis and its relative data parameters = to formats of values in their data reesponsive = H2O type 1 by rerunning the process in a volume of H2O..

basics on the interactions of resultance by releasing a H2O down a incline:

Illustration of electrophoresis retardation

1) the process of the trunkated conality will drag the remaining H2O molecule by a increase of verged volume H

by the ionic values

2) the basis of the alternate H2O side of the H atom in the H2O as being flattened to either a concave or convex  similarity in which side is fastest:electron vector

by ionic anti values of electrons

3)the process of the O atom as the input or flow of H2O as being a volume in function to increase its volume

as the intermix of eleectrons and anti electrons shared on the possibilities of the amount of variance of their states =

15 to the 15.F = H2O x

The dispersed particles have an electric surface charge, on which an external electric field exerts an electrostatic Coulomb force. According to the double layertheory, all surface charges in fluids are screened by a diffuse layer of ions, which has the same absolute charge but opposite sign with respect to that of the surface charge. The electric field also exerts a force on the ions in the diffuse layer which has direction opposite to that acting on the surface charge. This latter force is not actually applied to the particle, but to the ions in the diffuse layer located at some distance from the particle surface, and part of it is transferred all the way to the particle surface through viscous stress. This part of the force is also called electrophoretic retardation force.

This photograph shows a technician using an electrophoresis apparatus to separate proteins by molecular weight.

Considering the hydrodynamic friction on the moving particles due to the viscosity of the dispersant, in the case of lowReynolds number and moderate electric field strength E, the speed of a dispersed particle v is simply proportional to the applied field, which leaves the electrophoretic mobility μe defined as:

\mu_e = {v \over E}.

The most known and widely used theory of electrophoresis was developed in 1903 by Smoluchowski[8]

\mu_e = \frac{\varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0\zeta}{\eta},

where εr is the dielectric constant of the dispersion medium, ε0 is the permittivity of free space (C² N−1 m−2), η isdynamic viscosity of the dispersion medium (Pa s), and ζ is zeta potential (i.e., the electrokinetic potential of theslipping plane in the double layer).

The Smoluchowski theory is very powerful because it works for dispersed particles of any shape at any concentration. Unfortunately, it has limitations on its validity. It follows, for instance, from the fact that it does not include Debye length κ−1. However, Debye length must be important for electrophoresis, as follows immediately from the Figure on the right. Increasing thickness of the double layer (DL) leads to removing point of retardation force further from the particle surface. The thicker DL, the smaller retardation force must be.

Detailed theoretical analysis proved that the Smoluchowski theory is valid only for sufficiently thin DL, when particle radius a is much greater than the Debye length :

 a \kappa \gg 1.

This model of “thin Double Layer” offers tremendous simplifications not only for electrophoresis theory but for many other electrokinetic theories. This model is valid for most aqueous systems because the Debye length is only a few nanometers there. It breaks only for nanocolloids in solution with ionic strength close to water

The Smoluchowski theory also neglects contribution of surface conductivity. This is expressed in modern theory as condition of small Dukhin number

Du < < 1

In the effort of expanding the range of validity of electrophoretic theories, the opposite asymptotic case was considered, when Debye length is larger than particle radius:

κa < 1.

Under this condition of a “thick Double Layer”, Huckel [9] predicted the following relation for electrophoretic mobility:

\mu_e = \frac{2\varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0\zeta}{3\eta}.

This model can be useful for some nanoparticles and non-polar fluids, where Debye length is much larger than in the usual cases.

There are several analytical theories that incorporate surface conductivity and eliminate the restriction of a small Dukhin number, pioneered by Overbeek[10] and Booth[11]. Modern, rigorous theories valid for any Zeta potential and often any κa stem mostly from Dukhin-Semenikhin theory[12]. In the thin Double Layer limit, these theories confirm the numerical solution to the problem provided by O’Brien and White.[13]

Recent molecular dynamics simulations nonetheless suggest that a surface charge is not always required for electrophoresis to occur, and that even neutral particles can migrate in an electric field due to the molecular structure of water at the interface.[14].

the gravity lens

transpose warping of subtractive value differences

By Henryk Szubinski

rotation around the x, y or z axis will map the sphere onto itself, ..

so that the 4th state of a spherical body such as a particle can be gravity lens mapped into 4 distinct parameters where the same values of the parameters of rrelations with spacetime can be traced to a electron orbiting a proton

by

6 transpose variance levels of the type 1 Hoags lensing as the process = A/B and the G value resultance in its variance levels

you can see here the reasons for gravity lensing; the basics of the andromeda galaxy underneath our own solar system: the comparatives with our solar system orbital bulge in relation to the centre of the milky way:

The clear definition of our solar system as a collective type eye in the zone background that defines its position as the background of the milky ways own cold matter; the gradual enhencements where they start to group a visable einstein ring.The positionality of the solar system as transposed onto the  milky ways own centre as though being above and directly on it.

transposeing

Examples

  • \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2  \end{bmatrix}^{\mathrm{T}} \!\! \;\! = \, \begin{bmatrix} 1   \\ 2  \end{bmatrix}.
  • \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2  \\ 3 & 4 \end{bmatrix}^{\mathrm{T}} \!\! \;\! = \, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3  \\ 2 & 4 \end{bmatrix}.
  •  \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4 \\ 5 & 6 \end{bmatrix}^{\mathrm{T}}  \!\! \;\! = \, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & 5\\ 2 & 4 & 6 \end{bmatrix}. \;

[edit]Properties

For matrices AB and scalar c we have the following properties of transpose:

  1. \left( \mathbf{A}^\mathrm{T} \right) ^\mathrm{T} = \mathbf{A} \quad \,
    Taking the transpose is an involution (self inverse).
  2. (\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{B}) ^\mathrm{T} = \mathbf{A}^\mathrm{T} + \mathbf{B}^\mathrm{T} \,
    The transpose respects addition.
  3. \left( \mathbf{A B} \right) ^\mathrm{T} = \mathbf{B}^\mathrm{T} \mathbf{A}^\mathrm{T} \,
    Note that the order of the factors reverses. From this one can deduce that a square matrix A is invertible if and only if AT is invertible, and in this case we have (A−1)T = (AT)−1. It is relatively easy to extend this result to the general case of multiple matrices, where we find that (ABCXYZ)TZTYTXTCTBTAT.
  4. (c \mathbf{A})^\mathrm{T} = c \mathbf{A}^\mathrm{T} \,
    The transpose of a scalar is the same scalar. Together with (2), this states that the transpose is a linear map from the space of m × n matrices to the space of all n × m matrices.
  5. \det(\mathbf{A}^\mathrm{T}) = \det(\mathbf{A}) \,
    The determinant of a square matrix is the same as that of its transpose.
  6. The dot product of two column vectors a and b can be computed as
     \mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{a}^{\mathrm{T}} \mathbf{b},

    which is written as ai bi in Einstein notation.

  7. If A has only real entries, then ATA is a positive-semidefinite matrix.
  8. (\mathbf{A}^\mathrm{T})^{-1} = (\mathbf{A}^{-1})^\mathrm{T} \,
    The transpose of an invertible matrix is also invertible, and its inverse is the transpose of the inverse of the original matrix.
  9. If A is a square matrix, then its eigenvalues are equal to the eigenvalues of its transpose.

[edit]Special transpose matrices

A square matrix whose transpose is equal to itself is called a symmetric matrix; that is, A is symmetric if

\mathbf{A}^{\mathrm{T}} = \mathbf{A}.\,

A square matrix whose transpose is also its inverse is called an orthogonal matrix; that is, G is orthogonal if

\mathbf{G G}^\mathrm{T} = \mathbf{G}^\mathrm{T} \mathbf{G} = \mathbf{I}_n , \, the identity matrix, i.e. GTG-1.

A square matrix whose transpose is equal to its negative is called skew-symmetric matrix; that is, A is skew-symmetric if

\mathbf{A}^{\mathrm{T}} = -\mathbf{A}.\,

The conjugate transpose of the complex matrix A, written as A*, is obtained by taking the transpose of A and the complex conjugate of each entry:

\mathbf{A}^* = (\overline{\mathbf{A}})^{\mathrm{T}} = \overline{(\mathbf{A}^{\mathrm{T}})}.

[edit]Transpose of linear maps

If fVW is a linear map between vector spaces V and W with nondegenerate bilinear forms, we define the transpose of f to be the linear map tfWV, determined by

B_V(v,{}^tf(w))=B_W(f(v),w) \quad \forall\ v \in V, w \in W.

Here, BV and BW are the bilinear forms on V and W respectively. The matrix of the transpose of a map is the transposed matrix only if the bases are orthonormal with respect to their bilinear forms.

Over a complex vector space, one often works with sesquilinear forms instead of bilinear (conjugate-linear in one argument). The transpose of a map between such spaces is defined similarly, and the matrix of the transpose map is given by the conjugate transpose matrix if the bases are orthonormal. In this case, the transpose is also called the Hermitian adjoint.

If V and W do not have bilinear forms, then the transpose of a linear map fVW is only defined as a linear map tfW*V* between the dual spaces of W and V.

vector force universe transpose areas in multiple parameters as velocity value lift

The “areal velocity” is proportional to angular momentum, and so for the same ….. Newton’s law of gravitation says that “every object in the universe attracts …. The area speed of the radius vector sweeping the orbit area is  refers to something different: namely the force, similar in mathematical form, 

So in relativity, the acceleration four-vector and the velocity four-vector are orthogonal.  In the rest frame of the object, the time component of the four force is  to special relativistic effects in a classical model of the Universe Special relativity is accurate only when the absolute value of the 

using the total magnitude of the depth-averaged velocity vector…. universe object lift lowparameter failure spacetime levels as force positional vectors ….. And since a rotation matrix commutes with its transpose, it is a normal ….. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitable. multiple force universe active failure 


as such displacement on total values =of the basis to forcevector = to the ….. lift force, the force modifies substantially the dynamics of the flow near  The components of the bubble velocity vector, are taken to be the same as …. of both as comparative with the positional parameter in the universe of 

27 Jul 2009  Transposed to the case of a flame sheet, it effectively shows that the ……When the combustion parameters are scaled to values representative of ….. the flow is potential (the rotational of the velocity vector is null and we …. such that areas of different locations in the front interact. 

Ever wondered if hyperspace/hyperdrives unknowingly utilise the Force in some way? escape velocity at the center of the hole is faster than the speed of light.  In the Babylon5universe, ships can fight in Hyperspace. …. In Vector Prime it explicitly says to go from the Core to the Outer Rim took a week. 

Home of Wiki & Reference Answers, the world’s leading Q&A site · Reference Answers ….written as a column vector and vT is its transpose (a row vector).  are simply different aspects of the same force — the electromagnetic force…. Since the velocity boost is along the z (and z’) axes nothing happens to the 

9 How many different resistance values can be created by combining three  10 A person in a rural area who has no electricity runs an extremely long  You transpose the air in its path into an unstable isotope which tends to …… For a positively charged particle, the direction of the force vector can be