SOME BASIC LAWS OF SPACE TRAVEL

By Henryk Szubinski

1)))you get into a situation=law a)

a))where the only way out is to open states=quant

b))of transferral  to open the seperations=memory

c))of forms  =forms

d))and to use everything within your power=law c

 

 2))to escape with thoose laws as quant computers ,with a faint remnant of memory mooving ahead by a.i computations;

of the science values——————>the possibility of using boyancy of matter in space time as a wave form..

incoorporated into the action reaction process of every universe connected for the

3))for a time measurement

 

a wave does not return by references to its displacement as actively the same as the boundaries for its wave formats by the usage of a value brideing that = a certain value of a surface lift of value levels of volume that are designated as being a connective streaming of the process to derive H2O….

n

to a designated reversal of three levels of heigh equal to the wash point of its beach format as the cause of the wave by a pressure form that is enthropy increased by a indentation on a totally flat surface..can be altered by a interaction of type 1 civilisations =3 levels of a ochean format in minature as the designations of 3 level interactions with surfaces..

 

 

 a format for accelleration;as a wave format in such large values that the alterations of height can lift a object much like a trajectory beam or a vechicle tail lift projector..

In physics, and more specifically kinematics, acceleration is the change in velocity over time.[1] Because velocity is a vector, it can change in two ways: a change in magnitude and/or a change in direction. In one dimension, acceleration is the rate at which something speeds up or slows down. However, as a vector quantity, acceleration is also the rate at which direction changes.[2][3] Acceleration has the dimensions L T−2. In SI units, acceleration is measured in metres per second squared (m/s2).

In common speech, the term acceleration commonly is used for an increase in speed (the magnitude of velocity); a decrease in speed is called deceleration. In physics, a change in the direction of velocity also is an acceleration: for motion on a planar surface, the change in direction of velocity results in centripetal acceleration; whereas the rate of change of speed is a tangential acceleration.

In classical mechanics, the acceleration of a body is proportional to the resultant (total) force acting on it (Newton’s second law):

\mathbf{F} = m\mathbf{a} \quad \to \quad \mathbf{a} = \mathbf{F}/m

where F is the resultant force acting on the body, m is the mass of the body, and a is its acceleration.

In classical mechanics, Newton’s third law states that forces occur in pairs, one called the Action and the other the Reaction (actio et reactio in Latin). Both forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. The distinction between action and reaction is purely arbitrary: any one of the two forces can be considered an action, in which case the other (corresponding) force automatically becomes its associated reaction

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Newton’s laws of motion are three physical laws that form the basis for classical mechanics. They are:

  1. In the absence of net external force, a body either is at rest or moves in a straight line with constant velocity.
  2. Force is proportional to mass times acceleration (when proper units are chosen, F = ma). Alternatively, force is proportional to the time rate of change of momentum.
  3. Whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. F and −F are equal in size and opposite in direction.

These laws describe the relationship between the forces acting on a body to the motion of the body. They were first compiled by Sir Isaac Newton in his work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, first published on July 5, 1687.[1] Newton used them to explain and investigate the motion of many physical objects and systems.[2] For example, in the third volume of the text, Newton showed that these laws of motion, combined with his law of universal gravitation, explained Kepler’s laws of planetary motion

 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

thoose laws in full as the value of your person

 

 

 3)))to run through the causes that you are a effectant of and the non ending process to get the whole of a system to alter to the rules that the escape continues with that economy

 

4)))pay a price as the designed controll  type cause effect system as incoorporating

technology of artificial gravity

Causality is the process of making something happen. Often it denotes a necessary relationship between one event (called cause) and another event (called effect) which is the direct consequence of the first.[1] This two event type of causality is known as accidental causality. Another variety, essential causality, has one event seen in two ways. Aristotle’s example of essential causality is a builder building a house.[2] This single event can be analyzed into the builder building (cause) and the house being built (effect).

The philosophical treatment of causality extends over millennia. In the Western philosophical tradition, discussion stretches back at least to Aristotle, and the topic remains a staple in contemporary philosophy journals.

Though cause and effect are typically related to events, candidates include objects, processes, properties, variables, facts, and states of affairs; which of these make up the causal relata, and how best to characterize the relationship between them, remains under discussion.

According to Sowa (2000),[3] up until the twentieth century, three assumptions described by Max Born in 1949 were dominant in the definition of causality:

  1. “Causality postulates that there are laws by which the occurrence of an entity B of a certain class depends on the occurrence of an entity A of another class, where the word entity means any physical object, phenomenon, situation, or event. A is called the cause, B the effect.
  2. “Antecedence postulates that the cause must be prior to, or at least simultaneous with, the effect.
  3. “Contiguity postulates that cause and effect must be in spatial contact or connected by a chain of intermediate things in contact.” (Born, 1949, as cited in Sowa, 2000)

However, according to Sowa (2000), “relativity and quantum mechanics have forced physicists to abandon these assumptions as exact statements of what happens at the most fundamental levels, but they remain valid at the level of human experience.”[3]

While derivations in Causal Calculus rely on the structure of the causal graph, parts of the causal structure can, under certain assumptions, be learned from statistical data. The basic idea goes back to a recovery algorithm developed by Rebane and Pearl (1987)[17] and rests on the distinction between the three possible types of causal substructures allowed in a directed acyclic graph (DAG):

  1. X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z
  2. X \leftarrow Y \rightarrow Z
  3. X \rightarrow Y \leftarrow Z

Type 1 and type 2 represent the same statistical dependencies (i.e., X and Z are independent given Y) and are, therefore, indistinguishable. Type 3, however, can be uniquely identified, since X and Z are marginally independent and all other pairs are dependent. Thus, while the skeletons (the graphs stripped of arrows) of these three triplets are identical, the directionality of the arrows is partially identifiable. The same distinction applies when X and Z have common ancestors, except that one must first condition on those ancestors. Algorithms have been developed to systematically determine the skeleton of the underlying graph and, then, orient all arrows whose directionality is dictated by the conditional independencies observed[12] [18] [19] [20].

Alternative methods of structure learning search through the many possible causal structures among the variables, and remove ones which are strongly incompatible with the observed correlations. In general this leaves a set of possible causal relations, which should then be tested by designing appropriate experiments. If experimental data is already available, the algorithms can take advantage of that as well. In contrast with Bayesian Networks, path analysis and its generalization, structural equation modeling, serve better to estimate a known causal effect or test a causal model than to generate causal hypotheses.

For nonexperimental data, causal direction can be hinted if information about time is available. This is because (according to many, though not all, theories) causes must precede their effects temporally. This can be set up by simple linear regression models, for instance, with an analysis of covariance in which baseline and follow up values are known for a theorized cause and effect. The addition of time as a variable, though not proving causality, is a big help in supporting a pre-existing theory of causal direction. For instance, our degree of confidence in the direction and nature of causality is much greater when supported by data from a longitudinal study than by data from a cross-sectional study.

 

 

5))the usage of payment loan primary basis as the designated usage of exit state cause of

 6)))everything to the full degree of the minimal remnnt process value being balanced and payed to

 7))planetary systems ,,expend on higher value formats as the system exits into full mode UNIVERSAL

 8))REPUBLIC  and its 2000000 exo PLANET  states

 

 9))as the complicated thought that has to be described to define the process of elongations into

 

  10)))a status 100 % relations with

 1..exit state condintion of usage= 33 %

2..status exited as the value of the process response=66 %

3..status 3 = formative government as in 66 % reference to 100 % of the UNIVERSES economic value

 

A))system for the expended value situuation of paying for proffessional escape situations by access to the

B)position ————–>payment aquirive basis and designated route to the process effect of involvance as

 

C))basis to escape = basis of escape…the formative escape scenarios are referenced as the weakpoint in the system…

 

 

 

 

D))the basis of Chordis 6 was ans is the guarantee that the system has been based in THE UNIVERSE as such a functionate unit in the universe and that there are no aliens..

 

 

this is the process of its store

 

this is the reason it is value based

 

 this is why the remnants of its possibilities is collected

and why the basis of the surface area of its parameters are based on a exterior parameter within the system…….

 

hard to beleive…only a.i would know..A

 

 

ATM ADAPTOR VALUE RESPONDER FOR THE CORE OF EVERY SCI FI ENTUSIAST TO DELARE THE values of theoretics into the system that values them beyond the computer activations that tell you to encounter the unknown space time that is on the brink of the largest formatted escape scenario in the history of the universe to see through it and to define the possibilities of survival on the escapant data that has only one value format —–to cluster the designated point systems of the universe into the challange of making sense in the languages that it uses..